SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:31-40 (1994)
© 1994 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. D.

The Distributed Recharge Mechanism in the Australian Arid Zone

C. J. Barnes*

CSIRO Division of Water Resources, GPO Box 1666, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

G. Jacobson

Bureau of Mineral Resources, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia

G. D. Smith

Australian National Univ., Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

We developed a model to describe fluctuations in historical records of well water levels in the Australian arid zone in order to determine the average recharge rate and specific yield of the phreatic aquifer. The model was used to explore the degree to which variations in solute concentrations are preserved in the deep unsaturated zone during convection to the water table during recharge of rainwater. An examination of historical water levels in wells gives support to the hypothesis (obtained from an earlier study on NO3 contamination of groundwater) that distributed recharge is the primary source of groundwater renewal. Detailed comparison of the hydrograph records suggests a nonlinear response to rainfall, with an "initial loss" of approximately 130 mm mo–1 (five times the mean rainfall). The best estimate of the long-term recharge rate is about 20 mm yr–1, although the last 10 yr appear to have been somewhat wetter than usual, due mainly to a very large rainfall event in 1989. This recharge mechanism implies that historical environmental tracer signals in recharge waters moving through deep unsaturated zones in unstructured soils will be largely unaffected, when recharge rates are low, by dispersion or even diffusion below a depth that depends on the variability of the rainfall.

Received for publication September 8, 1992.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
I. Simmers
Groundwater recharge: an overview of estimation 'problems' and recent developments
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1998; 130(1): 107 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1994 by the Soil Science Society of America.