SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:455-464 (1994)
© 1994 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Chadwick, O. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Chadwick, O. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Chadwick, O. A.

Synthesizing Bulk Density for Soils with Abundant Rock Fragments

Kirk R. Vincent*

Dep. of Geoscience, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721

Oliver A. Chadwick

Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Bulk density is a fundamental soil property that is difficult to determine for gravelly to extremely gravelly soils because results vary significantly with sample volume. For such coarse soils, the representative volume (for whole-soil bulk density) should be large, but guidelines for selecting an appropriate sample volume do not exist. We evaluated the representative volume for a soil with abundant rock fragments, by comparing measured properties of samples ranging in volume from 0.03 to 410 L. For whole-soil bulk density determination, the representative volume is 4 L or larger for a soil horizon containing 34% (v/v) gravel and is between 5 and 50 L for a soil horizon containing 54% gravel. Intact samples of that size are prohibitively large, so we developed an alternative approach that starts with measurement of fine-earth bulk density. For fine-earth bulk density, the sample volume needed for representative results is between 0.2 and 1 L for gravelly to extremely gravelly soils. The alternative approach reliably synthesizes whole-soil bulk density using (i) fine-earth bulk density from modest-sized samples, (ii) mass-size distribution from large (>40 kg) representative disturbed samples, and (iii) rock fragment bulk densities. The mass and volume of rock fragments that should be in a sample are added to the mass and volume used to calculate fine-earth bulk density. This method allows integration of lateral variability in the soil without the consequence of averaging properties across a large depth range.

Received for publication December 2, 1992.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. Kulmatiski, D. J. Vogt, T. G. Siccama, and K. H. Beard
Detecting nutrient pool changes in rocky forest soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2003; 67(4): 1282 - 1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. Rothe, K. Cromack Jr., S. C. Resh, E. Makineci, and Y. Son
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Changes Under Douglas-fir With and Without Red Alder
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2002; 66(6): 1988 - 1995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1994 by the Soil Science Society of America.