|
|
||||||||
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, 3111 Miller Plant Sciences, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19717
Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
USDA-ARS, Appalachian Soil and Water Conservation Research Lab., P.O. Box 867, Beckley, WV 25802
Dep. of Soil Science, P.O. Box 7619, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695
Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, P.O. Box 1071, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Dep. of Agronomy and Soils, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634
Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
*Corresponding author.
ABSTRACT
Little is known about the effect of soil factors on genetically altered bacteria. We altered Pseudomonas putida PH6 to contain the Escherichia coli genes for lactose utilization (lacZY). Except for lactose utilization, the genetically altered mutant, P. putida PH6(L1019), and the wild type strain were indistinguishable in the tests we employed. Both strains were tested for survival in eight different soils, and in one soil at temperatures of 15, 25, 35, and 40°C and soil water pressures of –0.03, –0.07, and –1.5 MPa. Few differences in survival of the two strains were observed in seven of the eight soils, but in the most acid soil (pH 5.0), numbers of PH6 were at least 100-fold higher than PH6(L1019) after 28 d. The percentage of lactose-positive (lac+) isolates averaged >95% in all eight soils unless PH6(L1019) numbers declined below 104 colony-forming units (CFU) g–1 of soil. Neither PH6 nor PH6(L1019) survived at 40°C after 3 d, and few differences in survival were observed between the two strains at 15 and 25°C. At 35°C, PH6 declined from
108 to
103 CFU g–1 of soil after 35 d, whereas PH6(L1019) declined from
108 CFU g–1 of soil to below the limit of detection (<10 CFU g–1 of soil) after 14 d. Few differences in survival between PH6 and PH6(L1019) were observed at –0.03 and –0.07 MPa, but at –1.5 MPa, PH6 survival was greater than PH6(L1019) at all sampling times. These results are the first to suggest that a soil abiotic factor can exert differences in survival between a wild type and genetically altered bacterium.
Received for publication January 29, 1993.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. E. Staley and D. K. Brauer Survival of a Genetically Modified Root-Colonizing Pseudomonad and Rhizobium Strain in an Acidic Soil Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 20, 2006; 70(6): 1906 - 1913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. N. Reva, C. Weinel, M. Weinel, K. Bohm, D. Stjepandic, J. D. Hoheisel, and B. Tummler Functional Genomics of Stress Response in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 J. Bacteriol., June 1, 2006; 188(11): 4079 - 4092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||