SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:829-835 (1994)
© 1994 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, T.
Right arrow Articles by Morra, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, T.
Right arrow Articles by Morra, M. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, T.
Right arrow Articles by Morra, M. J.

Thiosulfate Production in Cysteine-Amended Soil

T. Zhong and M. J. Morra*

Division of Soil Science, Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844

*Corresponding author (mmorra{at}marvin.ag.uidaho.edu).

ABSTRACT

Thiol-labile compounds are produced in cysteine-amended soil, as evidenced by the production of H2S following addition of reagents containing free sulfhydryl groups (–SH). Thiosulfate (S2O2–3) is a likely reactant candidate because it is an intermediate in biogeochemical S cycling and is reduced to H2S by -SH, but its presence in cysteine-amended soils has not been documented previously. Four soils were amended with L-cysteine (15 mmol kg–1 soil) incubated at 0.033 MPa soil water suction or under saturated conditions, and then extracted with 0.1 M LiCl. Colorimetric analysis of the extracts using cyanolysis with and without addition of a Cu2+ catalyst indicated the presence of S22–3 and a polythionate such as S4O2–6; positive interferences from the cyanolysis of S2– were minimal. Ion chromatographic analysis of the extracts showed a well-resolved peak with the same retention time as S2O2–3 and yielded concentration estimates similar to those obtained by colorimetry, providing positive identification of S2O2–3 in cysteine-amended soils. Thiosulfate production occurred under both saturated and unsaturated conditions, varied among soils from 0 to 35.2 mg S2O2–3-S kg–1, and was nearly eliminated by autoclaving the soil before incubation or by addition of NaN3. Although the exact pathway for S2O2–3 production is unknown, it is likely that H2S formation and subsequent oxidation are responsible.


NOTES

Funding provided by the Idaho Agric. Exp. Stn.

Received for publication July 26, 1993.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1994 by the Soil Science Society of America.