HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tomer, M. D. Articles by Anderson, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Tomer, M. D. Articles by Anderson, J. L. Agricola Articles by Tomer, M. D. Articles by Anderson, J. L.

Variation of Soil Water Storage across a Sand Plain Hillslope

Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

*Corresponding author (markt{at}soils.umn.edu).

ABSTRACT

Although landscape variations in soil properties and productivity are often attributed to soil water conditions, landscape-scale studies of soil water are rare. This study describes variability of soil layering and soil water storage on a sand plain hillslope. According to a nested grid (with spacings from 2 to 16 m), soil cores were collected by horizon, and soil water profiles were measured with a neutron probe during the 1992 growing season. Particle-size analysis was conducted on the soil samples. A topographic survey of the hillslope was conducted, and elevation, slope, and slope curvature maps were constructed. Fine aeolian sand overlies medium sand of alluvial origin. The fine sand is thickest at upland positions, indicating the hill is a dune remnant. Lamellae only occur in the finer upland soils. Surface water storage (0–0.7-m interval) is greatest at the toeslope, where the epipedon is mollic. Subsurface storage (0.7–1.7-m interval) is greatest at upland positions, where perching of soil water is associated with lamellae and the depositional discontinuity. Regression modeling showed that combinations of elevation (cubic trend), slope, and plan curvature explain 51 to 77% of the variability in profile water storage, depending on depth interval. When topographic trends are removed, spatial correlation of water storage only occurs within distances <6 m. Topographic trends can be used to model variability in soil water storage for this landscape, even though surface runoff is not significant.

Approved by the Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn. as Publication no. 21373.

Received for publication July 28, 1994.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Jiang, N. R. Kitchen, S. H. Anderson, E. J. Sadler, and K. A. Sudduth Estimating Plant-Available Water Using the Simple Inverse Yield Model for Claypan Landscapes Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 830 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Tomer, C. A. Cambardella, D. E. James, and T. B. Moorman Surface-Soil Properties and Water Contents across Two Watersheds with Contrasting Tillage Histories Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 27, 2006; 70(2): 620 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. F. Drury, T. Q. Zhang, and B. D. Kay The Non-Limiting and Least Limiting Water Ranges for Soil Nitrogen Mineralization Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2003; 67(5): 1388 - 1404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]