SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:969-974 (1995)
© 1995 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perfect, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kay, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Perfect, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kay, B. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Perfect, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kay, B. D.

Brittle Fracture of Fractal Cubic Aggregates

E. Perfect*

Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546

B. D. Kay

Dep. of Land Resource Science, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1

*Corresponding author (eperfl{at}ukcc.uky.edu).

ABSTRACT

The conventional Weibull model for brittle fracture assumes soil aggregates are Euclidean cubes. Recent developments in fractal theory suggest that fractal cubes may provide a more realistic representation of soil aggregates. We modified the Weibull model for fractal cubes, and compared the performance of the modified model with the conventional model using previously published brittle fracture data for air-dry aggregates, ranging in equivalent cubic length from 1.19 to 25.275 mm, collected from different soils under the same crop, and similar soils under different crops. Goodness-of-fit statistics showed that the modified model fit the data much better than the conventional model. The modified model also produced a more accurate estimate of the spread in aggregate strength values. The modified model has an extra parameter. This parameter is the mass fractal dimension (D) of the solid phase. The theoretical range for D is zero to three. All of the estimates of D were less than three. However, 5% of the estimates were significantly less than zero. We attributed these negative estimates to the absence of any relationship between strength and size (within the range of length scales investigated) in the case of the weakest aggregates. The D increased with increasing clay content. We showed that the D for the solid phase is theoretically identical to the D for the pore-size distribution. Thus, it may be possible to predict the pore-size distribution of soil aggregates from brittle fracture data.

Received for publication March 16, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. Munkholm and E. Perfect
Brittle Fracture of Soil Aggregates: Weibull Models and Methods of Parameter Estimation
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 25, 2005; 69(5): 1565 - 1571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
T. M. Nissen and M. M. Wander
Management and Soil-Quality Effects on Fertilizer-Use Efficiency and Leaching
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2003; 67(5): 1524 - 1532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
T. M. Zobeck, T. W. Popham, E. L. Skidmore, J. A. Lamb, S. D. Merrill, M. J. Lindstrom, D. L. Mokma, and R. E. Yoder
Aggregate-Mean Diameter and Wind-Erodible Soil Predictions Using Dry Aggregate-Size Distributions
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2003; 67(2): 425 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. J. Munkholm and B. D. Kay
Effect of Water Regime on Aggregate-tensile Strength, Rupture Energy, and Friability
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2002; 66(3): 702 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1995 by the Soil Science Society of America.