HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Healy, R. W. Articles by Livingston, G. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Healy, R. W. Articles by Livingston, G. P. Agricola Articles by Healy, R. W. Articles by Livingston, G. P.

Numerical Evaluation of Static-Chamber Measurements of Soil—Atmosphere Gas Exchange: Identification of Physical Processes

Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey, MS 413, Box 25046, Denver Federal Center, Lakewood, CO 80215-0046

Thomas F. Russell

Dep. of Mathematics, Univ. of Colorado, P.O. Box 173364, Campus Box 170, Denver, CO 80217-3364

Gordon L. Hutchinson

USDA-ARS-NPA, Natural Resources Research Center, Soil-Plant-Nutrient Research Unit, P.O. Box E, Ft. Collins, CO 80522-0470

Gerald P. Livingston

NASA Ames Research Center, Earth Science Division, Johnson Controls World Services, SGE:239-20, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000

*Corresponding author (rwhealy{at}usgs.gov).

ABSTRACT

The exchange of gases between soil and atmosphere is an important process that affects atmospheric chemistry and therefore climate. The static-chamber method is the most commonly used technique for estimating the rate of that exchange. We examined the method under hypothetical field conditions where diffusion was the only mechanism for gas transport and the atmosphere outside the chamber was maintained at a fixed concentration. Analytical and numerical solutions to the soil gas diffusion equation in one and three dimensions demonstrated that gas flux density to a static chamber deployed on the soil surface was less in magnitude than the ambient exchange rate in the absence of the chamber. This discrepancy, which increased with chamber deployment time and air-filled porosity of soil, is attributed to two physical factors: distortion of the soil gas concentration gradient (the magnitude was decreased in the vertical component and increased in the radial component) and the slow transport rate of diffusion relative to mixing within the chamber. Instantaneous flux density to a chamber decreased continuously with time; steepest decreases occurred so quickly following deployment and in response to such slight changes in mean chamber headspace concentration that they would likely go undetected by most field procedures. Adverse influences of these factors were reduced by mixing the chamber headspace, minimizing deployment time, maximizing the height and radius of the chamber, and pushing the rim of the chamber into the soil. Nonlinear models were superior to a linear regression model for estimating flux densities from mean headspace concentrations, suggesting that linearity of headspace concentration with time was not necessarily a good indicator of measurement accuracy.

Received for publication June 19, 1995.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Hossler and V. Bouchard The Joint Estimation of Soil Trace Gas Fluxes Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 20, 2008; 72(5): 1382 - 1393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. T. Venterea and J. M. Baker Effects of Soil Physical Nonuniformity on Chamber-Based Gas Flux Estimates Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 20, 2008; 72(5): 1410 - 1417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Rochette and N. S. Eriksen-Hamel Chamber Measurements of Soil Nitrous Oxide Flux: Are Absolute Values Reliable? Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2008; 72(2): 331 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. P. Livingston, G. L. Hutchinson, and K. Spartalian Trace Gas Emission in Chambers: A Non-Steady-State Diffusion Model Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 3, 2006; 70(5): 1459 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Hutchinson and P. Rochette Non-Flow-Through Steady-State Chambers for Measuring Soil Respiration: Numerical Evaluation of Their Performance Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2003; 67(1): 166 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Pedersen, S. O. Petersen, and F. P. Vinther Stochastic Diffusion Model for Estimating Trace Gas Emissions with Static Chambers Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2001; 65(1): 49 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S.M. Nay and B.T. Bormann Soil Carbon Changes: Comparing Flux Monitoring and Mass Balance in a Box Lysimeter Experiment Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2000; 64(3): 943 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text]