HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhang, X. C. Articles by Miller, W. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Zhang, X. C. Articles by Miller, W. P. Agricola Articles by Zhang, X. C. Articles by Miller, W. P.

Polyacrylamide Effect on Infiltration and Erosion in Furrows

USDA-ARS, National Soil Erosion Research Lab., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907

W. P. Miller

Dep. of Crop and Soil Science, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7272

*Corresponding author (zhangxun{at}ecn.purdue.edu).

ABSTRACT

Surface sealing and crusting are important factors affecting runoff and erosion in many cultivated soils. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of low rates of surface-applied anionic polyacrylamide (PAM) on surface sealing and crusting, water infiltration, and soil erosion. A series of experiments was conducted on a Cecil sandy loam soil (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludult) in ridge-furrow-type field plots (3.5 by 0.92 m). Polyacrylamide solutions containing 1 kg solids m^–3 and 2.5 mol CaSO₄ m^–3 were sprayed onto dry soil surfaces at 15 and 30 kg ha^–1 rates with two replicates each. Three simulated rains, 31 min each, were applied at an intensity of 85 mm h^–1 at 2-wk intervals. Final infiltration rates were 30 mm h^–1 for the control treatment for all three rains and were >85 mm h^–1 for the first rain and 45 mm h^–1 for the two following rains for the PAM treatments. Total soil loss of the control was 1.62 kg m^–2 for the first rain, while the average soil loss of the two PAM treatments was only 0.03 kg m^–2. For two subsequent rains, although the differences were narrowed, soil loss from PAM was 48 to 66% less than from the control. The percentage of sediments >0.5 mm in the PAM treatments was 45% greater than in the control, indicating high aggregate stability with PAM addition. The sediment reduction was attributed to the significant reduction of runoff and the prevention of rill formation due to PAM addition. Based on this study, surface application of PAM at a rate of 15 kg ha^–1 controlled surface sealing and crusting and therefore reduced runoff and erosion.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. S. Lee, C. J. Gantzer, A. L. Thompson, S. H. Anderson, and R. A. Ketcham Using High-Resolution Computed Tomography Analysis To Characterize Soil-Surface Seals Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 20, 2008; 72(5): 1478 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. A. Ajwa and T. J. Trout Polyacrylamide and Water Quality Effects on Infiltration in Sandy Loam Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 27, 2006; 70(2): 643 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Deng, J. B. Dixon, and G. N. White Adsorption of Polyacrylamide on Smectite, Illite, and Kaolinite Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 6, 2006; 70(1): 297 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. B. Mason, C. Amrhein, C. C. Goodson, M. R. Matsumoto, and M. A. Anderson Reducing Sediment and Phosphorus in Tributary Waters with Alum and Polyacrylamide J. Environ. Qual., October 12, 2005; 34(6): 1998 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.M. Cruse, B.E. Berghoefer, C.W. Mize, and M. Ghaffarzadeh Water Drop Impact Angle and Soybean Protein Amendment Effects on Soil Detachment Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2000; 64(4): 1474 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text]