HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kozak, E. Articles by Sokolowski, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kozak, E. Articles by Sokolowski, S. Agricola Articles by Kozak, E. Articles by Sokolowski, S.

A Modified Number-based Method for Estimating Fragmentation Fractal Dimensions of Soils

E. Kozak, Z. Sokoowska and W. Stpniewski

Inst. of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 20236 Lublin, Poland

Ya. A. Pachepsky^*

USDA-ARS, Systems Research Lab., Bldg. 007, Rm. 008, BARC-West, Beltsville, MD 20705

S. Sokoowski

Computer Lab., Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Skodowska Univ., 20031 Lublin, Poland

*Corresponding author (ypachepsky{at}asrr.ars.usda.gov).

ABSTRACT

Fractal theory has been applied to the characterization of particle- and aggregate-size distributions in soils. We used a number-based method for estimating fragmentation fractal dimensions from these distributions. This method has several inconsistencies. The objectives of our study were to: (i) propose a modified number-based method, (ii) evaluate the modified method using published data on particle- and aggregate-size distributions, and (iii) apply the modified method to a large particle-size distribution data base to analyze the validity of fractal scaling. Assuming scale-invariant fragmentation to be a valid model of particle-size distribution within size ranges of fractions, we derived a formula expressing the characteristic grain size as a function of the fractal dimension and limits of the grain size range. Parameters of Turcotte's fractal fragmentation model were found by minimizing the sum of squares of differences between measured and calculated masses of grain fractions. Comparison between original and modified number-based methods showed that the modified method generally resulted in lower fragmentation fractal dimensions than the original method. The modified method was applied to a data set of particle-size distributions of 2600 soil samples. In 80% of samples, the fractal scaling was not applicable across the whole range of particle size between 0.002 and 1 mm, since errors of the fractal fragmentation model were statistically significantly larger than measurement errors, and estimates of the fractal dimension were larger than 3. It appears that models more sophisticated than scale-invariant fragmentation are required to simulate soil particle-size distributions.

Received for publication July 28, 1994.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. R. Filgueira, Y. A. Pachepsky, and L. L. Fournier TIME-MASS SCALING IN SOIL TEXTURE ANALYSIS Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2003; 67(6): 1703 - 1706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. H. Skaggs, L. M. Arya, P. J. Shouse, and B. P. Mohanty Estimating Particle-Size Distribution from Limited Soil Texture Data Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2001; 65(4): 1038 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Millan and Y. Pachepsky On the Characteristic Aggregate Size for Estimating Fractal Dimensions of Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2001; 65(3): 956 - 957. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.N. Aubertot, C. Dürr, K. Kiêu, and G. Richard Characterization of Sugar Beet Seedbed Structure Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 1999; 63(5): 1377 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. Bittelli, G. S. Campbell, and M. Flury Characterization of Particle-Size Distribution in Soils with a Fragmentation Model Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 1999; 63(4): 782 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text]