HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Or, D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Or, D. Agricola Articles by Or, D.

Drip Irrigation in Heterogeneous Soils: Steady-State Field Experiments for Stochastic Model Evaluation

Department of Plants, Soils, and Biometeorology, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322-4820

*Corresponding author (dani{at}tal.agsci.usu.edu).

ABSTRACT

In many drip-irrigated fields, spatial variations in soil properties induce variations in wetting patterns about the drippers, resulting in uncertainty in the interpretation and use of sensor-based soil water information. In previous work, analytical tools to quantify the effects of spatial variation in soil hydraulic properties on wetting patterns were developed. The objective of this study was to validate some of these analytical results. Following the characterization of the soil hydraulic properties in the study site, water was supplied from arrays of surface and subsurface point sources at constant flow rates. About 160 tensiometers and 100 time domain reflectometry (TDR) probes were installed at fixed positions relative to the source (for each flow rate and source location) and were monitored daily. The resulting spatial moments of matric head and water content were compared with analytical model predictions. Results revealed a large discrepancy between measurements and predictions based on the field-estimated variability in (the exponent of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity function). Better agreement was obtained when a reduced variability in was used. This suggests that soil hydraulic properties measured under ponding may be biased by the presence of large pores. Overall, the analytical model was capable of using information on the (permanent) spatial variability in soil hydraulic properties to predict the variability in flow attributes. However, even with better soil characterization and smaller soil variability, model predictions should be viewed as first approximations of the extent of variability in matric head and water content.

Received for publication May 10, 1995.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Mmolawa and D. Or Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of Analytical Volume Balance Model for Soil Water Dynamics under Drip Irrigation Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2003; 67(6): 1657 - 1671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Al-Jabri, R. Horton, and D. B. Jaynes A Point-Source Method for Rapid Simultaneous Estimation of Soil Hydraulic and Chemical Transport Properties Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2002; 66(1): 12 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.S. Van Pelt and P. J. Wierenga Temporal Stability of Spatially Measured Soil Matric Potential Probability Density Function Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2001; 65(3): 668 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]