HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Busse, M. D. Articles by Barrett, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Busse, M. D. Articles by Barrett, J. W. Agricola Articles by Busse, M. D. Articles by Barrett, J. W.

Changes in Ponderosa Pine Site Productivity following Removal of Understory Vegetation

USDA-Forest Service, Silviculture Lab., 2400 Washington Ave., Redding, CA 96001

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Competition from understory vegetation for water and nutrients can limit productivity of young forest stands. Less is known of the effect of understory vegetation on long-term stand growth or soil organic properties. The effect of understory vegetation on periodic annual increments (PAIs) of basal area, height, and volume for ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl.) in central Oregon at 4- or 5-yr intervals was examined for a 35-yr period. Soil C, N, and microbial biomass C (MBC) were also quantified after 32 and 35 yr with and without understory vegetation on a sandy loam pumice soil (Xeric Vitricryand). Five tree spacings, ranging from 2.0 to 8.0 m (154–2469 trees ha^–1), in combination with two understory treatments (understory vegetation present or continuously absent) were installed in 1959. Total understory vegetation cover averaged 35% between 1959 and 1994 for treatments with understory vegetation present, and was dominated by three shrub species: antelope bitterbrush [Purshia tridentata (Pursh) DC.], greenleaf manzanita (Arctostaphylos patula Green), and snowbrush (Ceanothus velutinus Dougl. ex Hook.). Covariance analyses of PAIs for each successive interval were performed using appropriate stand parameters at the start of each interval as covariates. Tree growth was reduced by competing understory vegetation during the first 12 to 20 yr only; understory vegetation did not reduce the adjusted PAIs during the last 15 yr. Soil C and N were measured incrementally to a depth of 24 cm. Presence of understory vegetation resulted in greater C and N in the O horizon and upper 4 to 12 cm of mineral soil. Seasonal MBC, measured at 14-d intervals from May to November, was greater when understory vegetation was present. The results suggest that understory vegetation plays an important role in maintaining soil quality.

Received for publication February 1, 1995.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. G. Wagner, K. M. Little, B. Richardson, and K. Mcnabb The role of vegetation management for enhancing productivity of the world's forests Forestry, January 1, 2006; 79(1): 57 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Echeverria, D. Markewitz, L. A. Morris, and R. L. Hendrick Soil Organic Matter Fractions under Managed Pine Plantations of the Southeastern USA Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2004; 68(3): 950 - 958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. W. Lister, J. A. Burger, and S. C. Patterson Role of Vegetation in Mitigating Soil Quality Impacted by Forest Harvesting Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2004; 68(1): 263 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]