|
|
||||||||
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences
USDA-ARS, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
*Corresponding author (bezdicek{at}wsu.edu).
ABSTRACT
Chemical and microbial aspects of soil quality are an important consideration when evaluating the benefits of soil conservation efforts such as the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of CRP and wheat-fallow (W-F) soils using soil biological and chemical parameters and C and N mineralization processes. The study was conducted on 20 CRP/W-F paired sites in eastern Washington, on Ritzville silt loam (coarse-silty, mixed, mesic Calciorthidic Haploxerolls). Soils collected from the paired fields were analyzed for chemical and biological parameters that have been suggested as indicators of soil quality. Potential enzyme activities and soil N were higher in the CRP soil than the W-F soil. Although there were no significant differences in total organic carbon (TOC) or microbial biomass carbon (MBC) the C mineralization potentials and C pools were significantly different between the CRP and W-F soils. Soil biota measurements showed there was greater active bacterial biomass in the CRP soil but greater fungal-feeding nematodes, flagellates, and amoebae in the W-F soil. The C mineralization study suggests that there is a significant increase in the secondary C pool of the CRP soil, which may indicate a buildup of higher quality soil organic matter and the potential for higher enzyme levels. When grass or straw was added to each soil type, the W-F soil produced more CO2 with either substrate than the CRP soil, indicating C limiting conditions in the W-F soil. Since it is unknown what constitutes good soil quality, these shifts in chemical and biological parameters may seem subtle. However, in general, trends in the data indicated that soil quality in the CRP was improved after 4 to 7 yr, compared with its previous management in W-F cropland.
Received for publication October 9, 1995.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Suman, M. Lal, A. K. Singh, and A. Gaur Microbial Biomass Turnover in Indian Subtropical Soils under Different Sugarcane Intercropping Systems Agron. J., May 3, 2006; 98(3): 698 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Bronson, T. M. Zobeck, T. T. Chua, V. Acosta-Martinez, R. S. van Pelt, and J. D. Booker Carbon and Nitrogen Pools of Southern High Plains Cropland and Grassland Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2004; 68(5): 1695 - 1704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Dao, J. H. Stiegler, J. C. Banks, L. B. Boerngen, and B. Adams Post-Contract Land Use Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Conservation Reserve Grasslands Agron. J., January 1, 2002; 94(1): 146 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Amelung, J. M. Kimble, S. Samson-Liebig, and R. F. Follett Restoration of Microbial Residues in Soils of the Conservation Reserve Program Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2001; 65(6): 1704 - 1709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Huggins, G. W. Randall, and M. P. Russelle Subsurface Drain Losses of Water and Nitrate following Conversion of Perennials to Row Crops Agron. J., May 1, 2001; 93(3): 477 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.A. Schipper and G.P. Sparling Performance of Soil Condition Indicators Across Taxonomic Groups and Land Uses Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2000; 64(1): 300 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M.M. Wander and G.A. Bollero Soil Quality Assessment of Tillage Impacts in Illinois Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 1999; 63(4): 961 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||