SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:896-900 (1997)
© 1997 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perfect, E.
Right arrow Articles by Blevins, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Perfect, E.
Right arrow Articles by Blevins, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Perfect, E.
Right arrow Articles by Blevins, R. L.

Fractal Characterization of Soil Aggregation and Fragmentation as Influenced by Tillage Treatment

E. Perfect* and R. L. Blevins

Department of Agronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091

*Corresponding author (eperfect{at}ca.uky.edu).

ABSTRACT

Parameters are needed to quantify tillage-induced changes in soil structure. Our objective was to see if fractal parameters from ped mass- and number-size relations could be applied to quantify such changes. Soil from long-term conventional (moldboard plow, MP, plus two passes with a disk harrow, DH) and no-till (NT) plots on a Maury silt loam (fine, mixed, mesic Typic Paleudalf) was air dried and sieved into six size classes ranging from 0.5–1 to 16–31.5 mm. The mass percentage and weight of 100 peds in each size class were used to calculate the mean mass per ped and number of peds as a function of scale. Fractal equations were then fitted to both data sets (R2 always ≥ 0.99). The resulting parameter estimates were Dm (mass fractal dimension) and km (mass of an aggregate of unit length) for the mass-size relation, and Dt (fragmentation fractal dimension) and kf (number of fragments of unit length) for the number-size distribution. Significant tillage effects were observed for Dm, Df, and kf. The Dm increased from 2.88 for NT to ≥ 2.94 for MP and DH, suggesting differential compaction of large aggregates by plowing and disking. The Df was always less than the Dm, as predicted by theory. Soil fragmentation was least for NT (Df = 2.02) and greatest for MP (Df = 2.55); for DH, the Df = 2.15 suggesting that disking broke up large fragments and/or coalesced small fragments following plowing. The kf, which was shown to be nonlinearly related to the Df, was least for MP and greatest for NT. Similar studies on other soils are needed to test the general applicability of these fractal relations to soil structure.


NOTES

Kentucky Agric. Exp. Stn. Contribution no. 96-06-027.

Received for publication April 15, 1996.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. J. Munkholm, E. Perfect, and J. Grove
Incorporation of Water Content in the Weibull Model for Soil Aggregate Strength
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., April 5, 2007; 71(3): 682 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. Munkholm and E. Perfect
Brittle Fracture of Soil Aggregates: Weibull Models and Methods of Parameter Estimation
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 25, 2005; 69(5): 1565 - 1571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
B. Eghball, J. S. Schepers, M. Negahban, and M. R. Schlemmer
Spatial and Temporal Variability of Soil Nitrate and Corn Yield: Multifractal Analysis
Agron. J., March 1, 2003; 95(2): 339 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
B. J. Foley and L. R. Cooperband
Paper Mill Residuals and Compost Effects on Soil Carbon and Physical Properties
J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2002; 31(6): 2086 - 2095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J.N. Aubertot, C. Dürr, K. Kiêu, and G. Richard
Characterization of Sugar Beet Seedbed Structure
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 1999; 63(5): 1377 - 1384.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the Soil Science Society of America.