SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:1423-1427 (1997)
© 1997 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kabrick, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McSweeney, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kabrick, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McSweeney, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kabrick, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McSweeney, K.

Comparison of Sampling Methods for Estimating Pit and Mound Microtopography

J. M. Kabrick*

School of Natural Resources, Univ. of Missouri, 1-31 Agriculture Building, Columbia, MO 65211

N. L. Meyers

Dep. of Plant and Earth Sciences, Univ. of Wisconsin, River Falls, WI 54022

K. McSweeney

Dep. of Soil Science, 1525 Observatory Dr., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706

*Corresponding author (kabrick{at}sylvan.snr.missouri.edu).

ABSTRACT

We developed a method for making rapid estimates of pit and mound microtopography for characterizing research sites, soil map units, and ecological land types. We conducted this study in the drumlinized uplands of northeastern Wisconsin, where pit and mound microtopography is extensive. We established one 10 by 30 m grid and one 300-m transect on each of four drumlins and identified a pit, a mound, or neither at nodes 1 m apart (300 observations per grid or transect). Pit and mound microtopography was estimated by calculating the proportion of pits, mounds, and points lacking evidence of pit and mound microtopography at nodes within each grid or transect. The optimal node spacing for grid and transect sampling methods was determined by repeatedly subsampling data derived from each method and identifying the lowest mean square error. The precision of grid sampling vs. transect sampling was determined by comparing the standard errors estimated with each method. Transects were more precise and time-efficient than grids for estimating pit and mound microtopography percentages. Satisfactory results were obtained with 300-m-long transects with 3-m node spacing. Transect methods appear applicable to the quantification of other types of microtopography.

Received for publication July 12, 1996.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the Soil Science Society of America.