HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Garnier, P. Articles by Baveye, P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Garnier, P. Articles by Baveye, P. Agricola Articles by Garnier, P. Articles by Baveye, P.

Determining the Hydraulic Properties of a Swelling Soil from a Transient Evaporation Experiment

Laboratoire d'Hydrophysique, ORSTOM, 32, Avenue Henri Varagnat, 93143 Bondy Cedex, France

M. Rieu^*

ORSTOM, 213 Rue Lafayette, 75480 Paris Cedex, France

P. Boivin

ORSTOM Hann, BP 1346, Dakar, Senegal

M. Vauclin

Laboratoire d'Etude des Transferts en Hydrologie et Environnement, LTHE, UMR (CNRS, INPG, UJF), BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France

P. Baveye

Lab. of Environmental Geophysics, Bradfield Hall, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY

* Corresponding author ( rieu{at}paris.orstom.fr).

ABSTRACT

Most methods used to determine the hydraulic properties of swelling soils (i.e., the shrinkage curve [e()], the moisture retention curve [h()], and the hydraulic conductivity curve [K()]) are time consuming because they require measurements of several different parameters (either in separate experiments or by using very expensive equipment). We propose a simple evaporation experiment to simultaneously determine all three soil hydraulic properties. The method is illustrated using samples of a Vertisol from the Senegal River valley. The value of e() is determined during the experiment by horizontal and vertical linear deformation measurements, whereas an inverse parameter estimation method is used to determine h(T) and K(). This method relies on a water flow model that takes into account the three-dimensional and anisotropic deformation of the soil. The reliability of the estimated parameter values was checked and we compared the results with those obtained by a multistep outflow experiment. Good agreement was found between the results of the different procedures. The sensitivity of the method to deformation was also analyzed. In the soil investigated, the inverse method does not seem to require the use of a water flow model that takes into account deformation. However, a correction for deformation is needed if the characteristic functions are sought in terms of the volumetric water content of the soil.

Received for publication December 6, 1996.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Y. Chertkov The Shrinkage Geometry Factor of a Soil Layer Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 29, 2005; 69(6): 1671 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Peng and R. Horn Modeling Soil Shrinkage Curve across a Wide Range of Soil Types Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., April 11, 2005; 69(3): 584 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Y. Chertkov, I. Ravina, and V. Zadoenko An Approach for Estimating the Shrinkage Geometry Factor at a Moisture Content Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 1807 - 1817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Finsterle Multiphase Inverse Modeling: Review and iTOUGH2 Applications Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2004; 3(3): 747 - 762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Bruckler, P. Bertuzzi, R. Angulo-Jaramillo, and S. Ruy Testing an Infiltration Method for Estimating Soil Hydraulic Properties in the Laboratory Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2002; 66(2): 384 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Arya, F. J. Leij, P. J. Shouse, and M. Th. van Genuchten Relationship between the Hydraulic Conductivity Function and the Particle-Size Distribution Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 1999; 63(5): 1063 - 1070. [Abstract] [Full Text]