HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Darusman, Articles by Lamm, F. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Darusman, Articles by Lamm, F. R. Agricola Articles by Darusman, Articles by Lamm, F. R.

Water Flux below the Root Zone vs. Drip-Line Spacing in Drip-Irrigated Corn

Faculty of Agric., Syiah Kuala Univ., Darussalam, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia

Akhter H. Khan and Loyd R. Stone^*

Dep. of Agronomy, Throckmorton PSC, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506-5501

Freddie R. Lamm

NW Res.-Ext. Ctr., Colby, KS 67701-0830

* Corresponding author ( lrstone{at}ksu.edu).

ABSTRACT

Use of microirrigation (drip) is increasing, prompted by factors such as a greater ability to control losses of water and nutrients from the root zone. The cost of drip can be reduced by using wider drip-line spacings. Our objective was to evaluate water flux below the root zone (1.5-m soil depth) with a subsurface drip irrigation system having drip-line spacings of 1.5, 2.3, and 3.1 m near Colby, KS. The soil is a deep silt loam that formed in loess. The crop was corn (Zea mays L.), planted in rows spaced 0.76 m apart. Water flux at the 1.5-m soil depth was determined in five treatments (Trt.): 1.5-m spacing, full irrigation; 2.3-m spacing, 67% of full irrigation; 2.3-m spacing, full irrigation; 3.1-m spacing, 50% of full irrigation; and 3.1-m spacing, full irrigation. With full irrigation, irrigation plus effective rain equaled calculated corn evapotranspiration (ET). Tensiometers were placed below the drip line and at increments of 0.4 m from the drip line at soil depths of 1.4 and 1.7 m. Water flux was calculated by using a hydraulic conductivity (K) vs. matric potential (_m) relationship, _m data from tensiometers within the corn plots, and Darcy's equation of water flow. In-season water fluxes below the root zone (1.5 m) were 51, 118, and 124 mm at drip-line spacings of 1.5, 2.3, and 3.1 m, respectively. In 1990, corn grain yield was not significantly affected by spacing. In 1991, with drier initial soil-water conditions, corn yielded significantly less grain at spacings of 2.3 m (11.5 Mg ha^-1) and 3.1 m (10.7 Mg ha^-1) than at a drip-line spacing of 1.5 m (13.1 Mg ha^-1). If spacing between drip lines is increased beyond 1.5 m in the silt loam soils of western Kansas, there would be an associated increase in internal drainage from the root zone and decrease in corn yields.

Contribution 96-510-J, Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn. This material is based on work supported by the USDA Cooperative State Research Service under Agreement 89-COOP-1-4927.

Received for publication July 1, 1996.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. J. Gehl, J. P. Schmidt, L. R. Stone, A. J. Schlegel, and G. A. Clark In Situ Measurements of Nitrate Leaching Implicate Poor Nitrogen and Irrigation Management on Sandy Soils J. Environ. Qual., November 7, 2005; 34(6): 2243 - 2254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Fares and A.K. Alva Soil Water Components Based on Capacitance Probes in a Sandy Soil Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2000; 64(1): 311 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text]