HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Robles, M. D. Articles by Burke, I. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Robles, M. D. Articles by Burke, I. C. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Robles, M. D. Articles by Burke, I. C.

Soil Organic Matter Recovery on Conservation Reserve Program Fields in Southeastern Wyoming

Dep. of Forest Sciences

Ingrid C. Burke^*

Natural Resource Ecology Lab., Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Soil C and N changes following cessation of cultivation in semiarid soils is not well understood. We hypothesized that returning cultivated fields in southeastern Wyoming to perennial grasses through the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) would (i) increase labile pools of soil organic matter (SOM), and (ii) increase small-scale heterogeneity of SOM. Carbon and N in labile and passive pools of SOM were measured in CRP fields seeded with perennial grasses intermediate wheatgrass (Elytrigia intermedia [Host] Nevski ssp. intermedia), pubescent wheatgrass (Elytrigia intermedia [Schur.] A. Löve ssp. barbulata) and smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leysser), and in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-fallow fields. Mineralizable C increased from 0.37 g m^–2 d^–1 in wheat-fallow fields to 0.99 g m^–2 d^–1 in CRP fields; mineralizable N and coarse particulate C were consistently but not significantly higher in CRP fields. Fine particulate and total soil C and N were not significantly different between CRP and wheat-fallow. Within CRP fields, mineralizable C was significantly higher under grasses than in interspaces (1.96 vs. 0.73 g m^–2 d^–1, respectively), and mineralizable N and coarse particulate C and N were consistently but not significantly higher under grasses than in interspaces. Soil C and N have increased only slightly after 6 yr of CRP management, and future changes in land use management on these CRP fields, including grazing and cropping, may accrue some small benefits associated with improved soil fertility status.

Received for publication October 22, 1996.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. Kucharik Impact of Prairie Age and Soil Order on Carbon and Nitrogen Sequestration Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 12, 2007; 71(2): 430 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. H. Dao, J. H. Stiegler, J. C. Banks, L. B. Boerngen, and B. Adams Post-Contract Land Use Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Conservation Reserve Grasslands Agron. J., January 1, 2002; 94(1): 146 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Amelung, J. M. Kimble, S. Samson-Liebig, and R. F. Follett Restoration of Microbial Residues in Soils of the Conservation Reserve Program Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2001; 65(6): 1704 - 1709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Brejda, T. B. Moorman, D. L. Karlen, and T. H. Dao Identification of Regional Soil Quality Factors and Indicators: I. Central and Southern High Plains Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2000; 64(6): 2115 - 2124. [Abstract] [Full Text]