HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mohanty, B. P. Articles by van Genuchten, M. Th. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Mohanty, B. P. Articles by van Genuchten, M. Th. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Mohanty, B. P. Articles by van Genuchten, M. Th.

Impact of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity on the Prediction of Tile Flow

USDA ARS, U.S. Salinity Lab., 450 W. Big Springs Road, Riverside, CA 92507

*Corresponding author (bmohanty{at}ussl.ars.usda.gov).

ABSTRACT

Preferential flow through macropores and other structural voids in field soils most often occurs at or near saturation. Our earlier research revealed significant differences in the value of the saturated hydraulic conductivity (K_s) of a glacial till soil in central Iowa when obtained with five different measurement techniques. The five techniques included one laboratory constant-head permeameter method and four in situ methods: disc permeameter, Guelph permeameter, velocity permeameter, and double-tube permeameter. Differences in measured K_s values were attributed to differences in sample size, the existence or absence of open-ended macropores, and measurement principles. In this study, we used the different K_s estimates in a two-dimensional numerical model, CHAIN_2D, to predict water flow into a subsurface tile drain in the same field. Comparisons between predicted and observed tile flows were made during four crop growing seasons. Preferential flow observed in the tile drain during large storm events was predicted best by the model when using K_s values measured with the disc permeameter method, which least disturbed the boundary conditions of the flow field and better accounted for the macropore structures of the field soil. Quantitative and qualitative findings suggest that the disc permeameter was best suited for the field site.

Received for publication November 14, 1997.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Dasgupta, B. P. Mohanty, and J. M. Kohne Soil Hydraulic Conductivities and their Spatial and Temporal Variations in a Vertisol Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 20, 2006; 70(6): 1872 - 1881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W.D. Reynolds, B.T. Bowman, R.R. Brunke, C.F. Drury, and C.S. Tan Comparison of Tension Infiltrometer, Pressure Infiltrometer, and Soil Core Estimates of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2000; 64(2): 478 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text]