SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:349-355 (1999)
© 1999 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (61)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franzluebbers, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schomberg, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Franzluebbers, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schomberg, H. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Franzluebbers, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schomberg, H. H.

Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Aggregation in Response to Type and Frequency of Tillage

A. J. Franzluebbers*, G. W. Langdale and H. H. Schomberg

USDA-ARS, J. Phil Campbell Sr. Natural Resources Conservation Center, 1420 Experiment Station Rd., Watkinsville, GA 30677-2373

*Corresponding author (afranz{at}arches.uga.edu).

ABSTRACT

Little information exists on the biogeochemical effects of combining no-tillage planting with paraplowing (to improve deep water penetration) or with secondary tillage (to control weeds). We determined surface residue and soil C and N pools (total, particulate, microbial biomass, and mineralizable) and water-stable aggregation at depths of 0 to 25, 25 to 75, and 75 to 150 mm from a Cecil sandy loam (fine, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludults) in Georgia. Soil tillage treatments were a factorial arrangement of tillage type [(i) minimal disturbance with in-row chisel at planting, (ii) no-tillage planting with autumn paraplow, and (iii) no-tillage planting with secondary tillage during the summer] and tillage frequency [(i) every year, (ii) every second year, and (iii) every fourth year]. No-tillage planting without further disturbance occurred in remaining years. At a depth of 0 to 25 mm, basal soil respiration averaged 9 mg kg-1 d-1 with conventional tillage, 27 mg kg-1 d-1 with no-tillage planting and soil disturbance every year, and 36 mg kg-1 d-1 with no-tillage planting and soil disturbance every fourth year. At a depth of 0 to 150 mm, mean-weight diameter averaged 1.03 mm with conventional tillage, 1.12 mm with paraplow, 1.17 mm with secondary tillage, and 1.23 mm with in-row chisel. No-tillage planting with alternative tillage types and frequencies not only improved surface soil properties compared with conventional tillage, but also improved seed cotton yield an average of 19%. Biophysical improvement of surface soil structure would presumably lead to greater water infiltration and improved water use efficiency in the long term.

Received for publication March 23, 1998.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1999 by the Soil Science Society of America.