SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:501-509 (1999)
© 1999 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abbaspour, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Schulin, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Abbaspour, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Schulin, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Abbaspour, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Schulin, R.

Uncertainty in Estimation of Soil Hydraulic Parameters by Inverse Modeling: Example Lysimeter Experiments

Karim C. Abbaspour, Marion A. Sonnleitner* and Rainer Schulin

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Dep. of Soil Protection, Grabenstrasse 3, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland

* Corresponding author (sonnleitner{at}ito.umnw.ethz.ch).

ABSTRACT

An increasingly attractive alternative to the direct measurement of soil hydraulic properties is the use of inverse procedures. We investigated the consequences of using different variables or combinations of variables from among pressure head, water content, and cumulative outflow on the estimation of hydraulic parameters by inverse modeling. We also looked at a new multiplicative formulation of the objective function which does not require weights for different variables. The inverse study combined a global optimization procedure, Sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI), with a numerical solution of the one-dimensional variably saturated flow equation. We analyzed multistep drainage experiments with controlled boundary conditions on two large lysimeters. Estimated hydraulic parameters based on different objective functions were all different from each other; however, a significance test of simulation results based on these parameters revealed that most of the parameter sets produced simulation results that were statistically the same. Notwithstanding the significance test, ranking of the performances of the fitted parameters on the basis of the mean square error (MSE) statistic revealed that they were highly conditional with respect to the variables and the mathematical formulation of the objective function. To obtain statistically unconditional sets of parameters, we introduce and discuss the concept of "parameter conditioning" instead of "parameter fitting". Parameter conditioning identifies a parameter domain such that when propagated in a stochastic simulation, all or most of the measured points of a variable are within the 95% confidence interval of the Bayesian distribution of that variable.

Received for publication March 25, 1998.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
J. Mertens, R. Stenger, and G. F. Barkle
Multiobjective Inverse Modeling for Soil Parameter Estimation and Model Verification
Vadose Zone J., August 24, 2006; 5(3): 917 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
M. Larsbo, S. Roulier, F. Stenemo, R. Kasteel, and N. Jarvis
An Improved Dual-Permeability Model of Water Flow and Solute Transport in the Vadose Zone
Vadose Zone J., May 12, 2005; 4(2): 398 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. Larsbo and N. Jarvis
Simulating Solute Transport in a Structured Field Soil: Uncertainty in Parameter Identification and Predictions
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2005; 34(2): 621 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
S. Finsterle
Multiphase Inverse Modeling: Review and iTOUGH2 Applications
Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2004; 3(3): 747 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
S. Roulier, S. Roulier, and N. Jarvis
Analysis of Inverse Procedures for Estimating Parameters Controlling Macropore Flow and Solute Transport in the Dual-Permeability Model MACRO
Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2003; 2(3): 349 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. A. Vrugt and W. Bouten
Validity of First-Order Approximations to Describe Parameter Uncertainty in Soil Hydrologic Models
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2002; 66(6): 1740 - 1751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
G. Richard, J.F. Sillon, and O. Marloie
Comparison of Inverse and Direct Evaporation Methods for Estimating Soil Hydraulic Properties under Different Tillage Practices
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2001; 65(1): 215 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
B. Schmied, K. Abbaspour, and R. Schulin
Inverse Estimation of Parameters in a Nitrogen Model Using Field Data
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2000; 64(2): 533 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1999 by the Soil Science Society of America.