HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rasmussen, T. C. Articles by Williams, A. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Rasmussen, T. C. Articles by Williams, A. G. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Rasmussen, T. C. Articles by Williams, A. G.

DIVISION S-1-SOIL PHYSICS

Tracer vs. Pressure Wave Velocities through Unsaturated Saprolite

^a Warnell School of Forest Resources, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2152 USA
^b Jr., Parsons Engineering, Atlanta, GA 30326 USA
^c Geology Department, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2501 USA
^d Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK PL9 8AA

trasmuss{at}uga.edu

Saprolite is a form of weathered bedrock that is commonly used as the host material at waste disposal sites in the Southeastern Piedmont. However, estimating the unsaturated hydraulic and transport properties of saprolite is difficult due to saprolite's low permeability. We demonstrate the use of short-duration fluid irrigation pulses for maintaining unsaturated conditions in intact saprolite columns. Concomitant Cl^- tracer experiments demonstrate that irrigated waters moved through an effective volumetric porosity (0.038–0.108 cm³ cm^-3) substantially less than the ambient water-filled porosity (0.44 cm³ cm^-3). We observed the unexpected result that irrigation-induced pressure wave velocities (1983–3670 cm d^-1) were 1000 times faster than tracer velocities (2.04–6.00 cm d^-1). The relationship between pressure wave velocities and fluid velocities is described using kinematic wave theory, presented for four parametric representations (Brooks–Corey, van Genuchten–Mualem, Broadbridge–White, and the Galileo Number), that predicts fluid pressure velocities to be from approximately two to fifteen times faster than saprolite tracer velocities. None of the kinematic models was able to reproduce observed rapid pressure wave velocities. A hydraulic form of the advection–diffusion equation based on Richards' equation is presented that favorably predicts the shape of pressure response curves only when the kinematic velocity is ignored and the hydraulic diffusivity of the unsaturated saprolite is considered. Based on the advection–diffusion equation, diffusion-dominated soil water pressure wave velocities should decrease with depth, eventually conforming with kinematic wave theory. Pressure pulse velocity monitoring may be an additional tool for estimating unsaturated hydraulic properties in low permeability media.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. F. Germann and D. Hensel Poiseuille Flow Geometry Inferred from Velocities of Wetting Fronts in Soils Vadose Zone J., July 26, 2006; 5(3): 867 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]