HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Roy, J.W. Articles by Wagner-Riddle, C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Roy, J.W. Articles by Wagner-Riddle, C. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Roy, J.W. Articles by Wagner-Riddle, C.

DIVISION S-1-SOIL PHYSICS

Water Flow in Unsaturated Soil Below Turfgrass

Observations and LEACHM (within EXPRES) Predictions

^a Dep. of Land Resource Sci., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1

gparkin{at}lrs.uoguelph.ca

In cropped soils, water sustains the plants, affects the transport of nutrients within the root zone, and controls the leaching of nutrients and chemicals to ground water. The objectives of this study were (i) to investigate the effects of turfgrass on water flow in sandy loam soil during the growing season using field lysimeters, and (ii) to test the abilities of the models EXPRES and LEACHN with free-drainage and lysimeter bottom-boundary conditions, respectively, to simulate water movement in the lysimeters. Twelve field lysimeters were packed with a three-horizon profile, topped with Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) sod, and monitored for 2 yr. Saturated hydraulic conductivity, measured on cores, was much greater and more variable for turf than soil. The moisture-retention curve for turf also had a much steeper drop in water content at low applied negative head than soil. The lysimeters became very dry during the summer, and only drained during the spring and autumn. The model EXPRES generally predicted water flow well, but had some difficulty with water redistribution during the drying periods (gravity drainage and evapotranspiration). In general, with the free-drainage bottom-boundary condition, EXPRES predicted more drainage and less drying during the summer than was observed. Under conditions of little to no irrigation, the free-drainage condition over-predicted and the lysimeter condition under-predicted the total amount of measured drainage. Model predictions of drainage under heavily irrigated conditions were similar for both bottom-boundary conditions.

Abbreviations: AE, average error • EXPRES, Expert System for Pesticide Regulatory Evaluations and Simulations • GTIERC, Guelph Turfgrass Institute and Environmental Research Centre • ME, maximum error • PET, potential evapotranspiration • RMSE, root mean square error • TDR, time domain reflectometry

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Lazarovitch, A. Ben-Gal, and U. Shani An Automated Rotating Lysimeter System for Greenhouse Evapotranspiration Studies Vadose Zone J., May 26, 2006; 5(2): 801 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.W. Roy, J.C. Hall, G.W. Parkin, C. Wagner-Riddle, and B.S. Clegg Seasonal Leaching and Biodegradation of Dicamba in Turfgrass J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2001; 30(4): 1360 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]