SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter-Boggs, L.
Right arrow Articles by Reganold, J.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter-Boggs, L.
Right arrow Articles by Reganold, J.P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter-Boggs, L.
Right arrow Articles by Reganold, J.P.
Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:1651-1659 (2000)
© 2000 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-3-SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY

Organic and Biodynamic Management

Effects on Soil Biology

L. Carpenter-Boggsa, A.C. Kennedyb and J.P. Reganolda

a Dep. Crop and Soil Sciences, 201 Johnson Hall, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164-6420 USA
b USDA-ARS, Land Management and Water Conservation Research Unit, 215 Johnson Hall, Washington State Univ., P.O. Box 64621, Pullman, WA 99164-6421 USA

lcboggs{at}morris.ars.usda.gov

Biodynamic agriculture is a unique organic farming system that utilizes, in addition to the common tools of organic agriculture, specific fermented herbal preparations as compost additives and field sprays. The objective of this work was to determine whether biodynamic compost or field spray preparations affect the soil biological community in the short term, beyond the effects of organic management. Four fertilizer options: (i) composted dairy manure and bedding (organic fertilization), (ii) the same material composted with biodynamic compost preparations, (iii) mineral fertilizers, and (iv) no fertilizer were investigated with and without the biodynamic field spray preparations. Both biodynamic and nonbiodynamic composts increased soil microbial biomass, respiration, dehydrogenase activity, soil C mineralized in 10 d (MinC), earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) population and biomass, and metabolic quotient of respiration per unit biomass (qCO2) by the second year of study. No significant differences were found between soils fertilized with biodynamic vs. nonbiodynamic compost. Use of biodynamic field sprays was associated with more MinC and minor differences in soil microbial fatty acid profiles in the first year of study. There were no other observed effects of the biodynamic preparations. Organically and biodynamically managed soils had similar microbial status and were more biotically active than soils that did not receive organic fertilization. Organic management enhanced soil biological activity, but additional use of the biodynamic preparations did not significantly affect the soil biotic parameters tested.

Abbreviations: FAME, fatty acid methyl ester • HSD, Tukey's honestly significant difference • PC, principal component • PCA, principal component analysis • MinC, mineralized C • qCO2, metabolic quotient of respiration per unit biomass • SIR, substrate induced respiration • TBME, tert-butyl methyl ether




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. Deurer, S. Sivakumaran, S. Ralle, I. Vogeler, I. McIvor, B. Clothier, S. Green, and J. Bachmann
A New Method to Quantify the Impact of Soil Carbon Management on Biophysical Soil Properties: The Example of Two Apple Orchard Systems in New Zealand
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2008; 37(3): 915 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. J. Franzluebbers and J. A. Stuedemann
Early Response of Soil Organic Fractions to Tillage and Integrated Crop-Livestock Production
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2008; 72(3): 613 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. Hartmann and F. Widmer
Community Structure Analyses Are More Sensitive to Differences in Soil Bacterial Communities than Anonymous Diversity Indices
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., December 1, 2006; 72(12): 7804 - 7812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
J. R. Reeve, L. Carpenter-Boggs, J. P. Reganold, A. L. York, G. McGourty, and L. P. McCloskey
Soil and Winegrape Quality in Biodynamically and Organically Managed Vineyards
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2005; 56(4): 367 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2000 by the Soil Science Society of America.