SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bielders, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rajot, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bielders, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rajot, J.-L.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bielders, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rajot, J.-L.
Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:1776-1785 (2000)
© 2000 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-6-SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

On-Farm Evaluation of Ridging and Residue Management Practices to Reduce Wind Erosion in Niger

Charles L. Bieldersa, Karlheinz Michelsb and Jean-Louis Rajotc

a Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques, Université Catholique de Louvain, Place Croix du Sud 2/2, B-1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
b Institute for Plant Production and Agro-Ecology in the Tropics and Subtropics, Univ. of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
c IRD, LISA-Université Paris 12, 61 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, F-94010 Créteil Cedex, France

bielders{at}geru.ucl.ac.be

Wind erosion is regarded as a major contributor to the desertification process in the Sahel, yet little quantitative information is available for that region on soil losses by wind erosion under different land management practices. A 3-yr, on-farm experiment was, therefore, set up to assess the effect of ridging and either banded or broadcast millet stover mulches (2000 kg ha-1) on soil loss in a millet-cowpea intercrop. For wind directions approximately perpendicular to the orientation of ridges and residue bands, sediment mass balances were calculated from the change in horizontal sediment mass fluxes measured across the experimental plots with Big Spring Number Eight sand traps. Mass balance calculations for 16 events over 3 yr indicated an average soil loss of 17.5, 15.4, and 18.0 Mg ha-1 on control plots, and deposition of 15.5, 15.3, and 7.4 Mg ha-1 on banded residue plots in 1995, 1996, and 1997, respectively. Broadcast and banded residue mulches were not significantly different (P = 0.05) in terms of their sediment trapping efficiency. During the same time period, ridges reduced soil losses by an average of 57% compared with the control plots, but their efficiency was reduced to less than 15% after 100 mm of cumulative rainfall as ridges collapsed. Linear regression analysis using the incoming sand fluxes as the independent variable was used to estimate potential soil losses for all events with sediment fluxes <25 kg m-1 irrespective of wind direction. The calculations indicated potential soil losses of up to 79 Mg ha-1 on control plots and deposition of 41 Mg ha-1 on broadcast residue plots in a single year. For wind erosion control, broadcast millet stover mulching constituted the most effective control technique because it effectively protected the soil against erosion and its trapping efficiency is expected to be independent of wind direction.

Abbreviations: BSNE, big spring number eight







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Soil Science Society of America.