HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (26) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Curtin, D. Articles by Campbell, C.A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Curtin, D. Articles by Campbell, C.A. Agricola Articles by Curtin, D. Articles by Campbell, C.A.

DIVISION S-6-SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Tillage Effects on Carbon Fluxes in Continuous Wheat and Fallow–Wheat Rotations

^a New Zealand Institute for Crop & Food Research Limited, Private Bag 4704, Christchurch, New Zealand
^b Semiarid Prairie Agricultural Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Swift Current, SK, Canada S9H 3X2
^c Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6

curtind{at}crop.cri.nz

The traditional cropping system in semiarid regions of the Canadian prairies involves frequent summer fallowing with several tillage operations to control weeds during the fallow period. Recently, there has been a trend toward reduced tillage and more intensive cropping, but the impact of this shift in management on sequestration of atmospheric CO₂ remains uncertain. In 1995 and 1996, we measured fluxes of CO₂ in a tillage experiment that had been initiated in 1982 on a silt loam (Typic Haploboroll) in southwestern Saskatchewan. The experiment comprised two spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rotations (continuous wheat [Cont. W] and fallow–wheat [F–W]), each with conventional tillage (CT) and no-till (NT) treatments. In Cont. W, CO₂ fluxes tended to be lower under NT than under CT (mean annual flux was 20 to 25% less for NT than CT). In F–W, tillage effects on mean annual CO₂ flux were significant (P < 0.05) in the wheat phase only (NT 10% less than CT). Tillage had negligible effect on C inputs in crop residues. Lower CO₂ fluxes under NT than under CT were attributed to slower decomposition of crop residues placed on the surface of NT soil than when they were incorporated. With good growing conditions (and thus large inputs of residues) between 1989 and 1996, there was an accumulation of partially decomposed residues on the surface of NT soil. Carbon in surface residues represented about one-half of the C gained by NT soil. In Cont. W, surface residue C (in 1996) amounted to 3.6 t ha^-1 under NT vs 1.4 t ha^-1 under CT. Residue C amounts were smaller in the F–W system: 1.7 t ha^-1 (NT) and 0.7 t ha^-1 (CT). Based on our results, producers on medium-textured soils in the semiarid Canadian prairies who switch from the traditional wheat production system (conventionally tilled fallow–wheat) to continuous no-till cropping could, potentially, sequester 5 to 6 t C ha^-1 in soil organic matter and surface residues in 13 to 14 yr.

Abbreviations: Cont. W, continuous wheat • CT, conventional tillage • F–W, fallow–wheat • (F)–W, fallow phase of F–W • F–(W), cropped phase of F–W • NT, no-till

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Bono, R. Alvarez, D. E. Buschiazzo, and R. J. C. Cantet Tillage Effects on Soil Carbon Balance in a Semiarid Agroecosystem Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 18, 2008; 72(4): 1140 - 1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Roberson, K. C. Reddy, S. S. Reddy, E. Z. Nyakatawa, R. L. Raper, D. W. Reeves, and J. Lemunyon Carbon dioxide efflux from soil with poultry litter applications in conventional and conservation tillage systems in northern Alabama. J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 535 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Alvaro-Fuentes, M. V. Lopez, J. L. Arrue, and C. Cantero-Martinez Management Effects on Soil Carbon Dioxide Fluxes under Semiarid Mediterranean Conditions Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 11, 2008; 72(1): 194 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. M. Sainju, J. D. Jabro, and W. B. Stevens Soil Carbon Dioxide Emission and Carbon Content as Affected by Irrigation, Tillage, Cropping System, and Nitrogen Fertilization J. Environ. Qual., January 4, 2008; 37(1): 98 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. R. Brye, D. E. Longer, and E. E. Gbur Impact of Tillage and Residue Burning on Carbon Dioxide Flux in a Wheat-Soybean Production System Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 23, 2006; 70(4): 1145 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Omonode, A. Gal, D. E. Stott, T. S. Abney, and T. J. Vyn Short-term Versus Continuous Chisel and No-till Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 2, 2006; 70(2): 419 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Al-Kaisi and X. Yin Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Soil Carbon and Carbon Dioxide Emission in Corn-Soybean Rotations J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2005; 34(2): 437 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. B. Parkin and T. C. Kaspar Temporal Variability of Soil Carbon Dioxide Flux: Effect of Sampling Frequency on Cumulative Carbon Loss Estimation Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2004; 68(4): 1234 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Wang, D. Curtin, Y. W. Jame, B. G. McConkey, and H. F. Zhou Simulation of Soil Carbon Dioxide Flux During Plant Residue Decomposition Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2002; 66(4): 1304 - 1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]