SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brejda, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Allan, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brejda, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Allan, D. L.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brejda, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Allan, D. L.
Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:2125-2135 (2000)
© 2000 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-6-SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Identification of Regional Soil Quality Factors and Indicators

II. Northern Mississippi Loess Hills and Palouse Prairie

John J. Brejdaa, Douglas L. Karlenb, Jeffrey L. Smithc and Deborah L. Alland

a USDA-ARS, Wheat, Sorghum, and Forage Res. Unit, 344 Keim Hall, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
b USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Lab, 2150 Pammel Drive, Ames, IA 50011 USA
c USDA-ARS, 215 Johnson Hall, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164-6421 USA
d Dep. Soil, Water, and Climate, 1991 Buford Circle, Univ. Minn., St. Paul, MN 55108 USA

jbrejda{at}unlserve.unl.edu

Diversity of soil series present in a region may hinder identification of soil quality factors and indicators at a regional scale. Our objectives were (i) to identify soil quality factors for a diverse population of soils at the regional scale, (ii) to determine which factors vary significantly with land use, (iii) to select indicators from these factors that can be used with the National Resource Inventory (NRI) for monitoring soil quality, and (iv) to compare these results to a similar study involving only a single soil series. One hundred eighty-six points representing 75 soil series in the Northern Mississippi Valley Loess Hills and 149 points representing 58 soil series in Palouse and Nez Perce Prairies were sampled from a statistically representative subset of NRI sample points and analyzed for 20 soil attributes. Factor analysis was used to identify soil quality factors and discriminant analysis was used to identify factors and indicators most sensitive to land use within each region. In the Northern Mississippi Valley Loess Hills, five soil quality factors were identified. Discriminant analysis selected potentially mineralizable N (PMN), microbial biomass C (MBC), water stable aggregates (WSA), and total organic C (TOC) as the most discriminating attributes between land uses. In the Palouse and Nez Perce Prairies, six factors were identified. Discriminant analysis selected TOC and total N as the most discriminating attributes between land uses. The soil quality factors were similar among three of the four regions, but TOC was the only indicator common to all regions for distinguishing among land uses.

Abbreviations: CEC, cation-exchange capacity • CRP, Conservation Reserve Program • MBC, microbial biomass C • MEP, Mehlich III extractable P • MLRA, Major Land Resource Area • NRI, National Resource Inventory • PMC, potentially mineralizable C • PMN, potentially mineralizable N • TOC, total organic C • WSA, water stable aggregate

Abbreviations: *, ** Significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels of probability, respectively




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
F. Zvomuya, H. H. Janzen, F. J. Larney, and B. M. Olson
A Long-Term Field Bioassay of Soil Quality Indicators in a Semiarid Environment
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2008; 72(3): 683 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. C. R. de Lima, W. Hoogmoed, and L. Brussaard
Soil quality assessment in rice production systems: establishing a minimum data set.
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 623 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
W. K. Jung, N. R. Kitchen, K. A. Sudduth, R. J. Kremer, and P. P. Motavalli
Relationship of Apparent Soil Electrical Conductivity to Claypan Soil Properties
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 6, 2005; 69(3): 883 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. S. Andrews, D. L. Karlen, and C. A. Cambardella
The Soil Management Assessment Framework: A Quantitative Soil Quality Evaluation Method
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 1945 - 1962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
G. Sparling, R. L. Parfitt, A. E. Hewitt, and L. A. Schipper
Three Approaches to Define Desired Soil Organic Matter Contents
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2003; 32(3): 760 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
G. P. Sparling and L. A. Schipper
Soil Quality at a National Scale in New Zealand
J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2002; 31(6): 1848 - 1857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Soil Science Society of America.