HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chen, C. Articles by Payne, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Chen, C. Articles by Payne, W. A. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Chen, C. Articles by Payne, W. A. Related Collections Soil Physics Soil Models Hydraulic Conductivity

DIVISION S-1 - SOIL PHYSICS

Measured and Modeled Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of a Walla Walla Silt Loam

^a Oregon State Univ., Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box 370, Pendleton, OR 97801
^b Texas A&M Univ. System, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, 2301 Experiment Station Road, Bushland, TX 79012

* Corresponding author (w-payne{at}tamu.edu)

There are numerous methods of estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity [K()], ranging from direct measurement in the laboratory or field, to models that use only basic soil data, e.g., texture or water release curves (WRC). We evaluated K() for a Walla Walla silt loam (coarse-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Haploxeroll) using two field methods and the Mualem–van Genuchten model (MVG). Field methods were the internal drainage method (ID) and the Klaij and Vachaud method (MKV), which was modified to include hydraulic head (H), and used 20 yr of data from a dryland field experiment. Four approaches to estimate WRC were compared for the MKV, and two approaches to estimate parameters of the MVG. For water contents >0.20 m³ m^-3, the MKV gave K values that were two orders of magnitude less than those obtained from internal drainage experiments conducted under wetter conditions. When MVG parameters were predicted by the Rosetta model, which uses pedotransfer functions, K values approached those of the MVK. However, when model parameters were estimated from internal drainage and saturated hydraulic conductivity (K_sat) data, K() values were closer to those of the internal drainage experiments. The study reaffirms the difficulty of reconciling K() determined by different methodologies, and of extrapolating to values of outside those measured. It also demonstrates the sensitivity of the MVG and pedotransfer functions to different sources of input values. Advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches to determining K() are discussed.

Abbreviations: ET, evapotranspiration, H, hydraulic head • h, matric potential • ID, internal drainage method • K, hydraulic conductivity • K_sat saturated hydraulic conductivity • MKV, Modified Klaij and Vachaud method • MVG, Mualem–van Genuchten model • q, flux • SEE, standard error of estimate • WRC, water release curve • Y, yield • z, depth • , volumetric soil water content

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. A. Payne, C. Chen, and D. A. Ball Agronomic Potential of Narrow-Leafed and White Lupins in the Inland Pacific Northwest Agron. J., November 1, 2004; 96(6): 1501 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Gerard, M. Tinsley, and K. U. Mayer Preferential Flow Revealed by Hydrologic Modeling Based on Predicted Hydraulic Properties Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2004; 68(5): 1526 - 1538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Chen, W. A. Payne, R. W. Smiley, and M. A. Stoltz Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Eight Wheat Cultivars Planted on Seven Dates in Northeastern Oregon Agron. J., July 1, 2003; 95(4): 836 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]