SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clay, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clay, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Z.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Clay, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Z.
Soil Science Society of America Journal 65:1823-1828 (2001)
© 2001 Soil Science Society of America


DIVISION S-8 - NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT & SOIL & PLANT ANALYSIS

Nitrogen and Water Stress Interact to Influence Carbon-13 Discrimination in Wheat

D. E. Clay*,a, R. E. Engelb, D. S. Longc and Z. Liua

a Plant, Plant Science Dep., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007
b Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT
c Northern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State Univ., Havre, MT 59501

* Corresponding author (david_clay{at}sdstate.edu)

The impact of interactions between water and N stress on 13C isotopic discrimination ({Delta}) is not well understood. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of N on {Delta} in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under low, moderate, and high water stress. In a field study located near Havre, Montana, USA (48° 30' N lat. and 109° 22' W long.), wheat grown under three different water stress environments (low, moderate, and high) was fertilized with three different N rates (none, moderate, and high). Each treatment was replicated four times. The grain N fertilizer use efficiency increased as water stress decreased. A differential response of {Delta} to N was observed. In general, if plants were grown under high water stress and N increased yield, then adding N to N-deficient plants reduced {Delta} (-0.01{per thousand} for every kg of N added); and if plants were grown under low water stress and N increased yield, then adding N had little or no impact on {Delta}. The break point between N impacting or not impacting {Delta} was ~17.45{per thousand}. Under non-N limiting (moderate and high N) conditions the equation relating {Delta} to yield was, yield (kg ha-1) = -11000 + 884 {Delta}, r = 0.92**. Wheat grown under N-deficient conditions (0N treatment) did not fit this curve. By accounting for the impact of water and N stress on {Delta}, this variation could be explained. Results from this study suggest that {Delta} can be used to characterize N and water stress at different landscape positions in watershed studies.

Abbreviations: {Delta}, 13C isotopic discrimination • FUE, fertilizer use efficiency • OY, optimum yield • YLND, yield loss due to N deficiency • 0N, N-deficient conditions • **Siginificant at the 0.01 probability level







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.