SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fagroud, M.
Right arrow Articles by Van Meirvenne, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fagroud, M.
Right arrow Articles by Van Meirvenne, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fagroud, M.
Right arrow Articles by Van Meirvenne, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Physics
Right arrow Spatial Distribution
Right arrow Statistics
Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:1134-1142 (2002)
© 2002 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-1—SOIL PHYSICS

Accounting for Soil Spatial Autocorrelation in the Design of Experimental Trials

M. Fagrouda and M. Van Meirvenne*,b

a Ecole Nationale d'Agriculture de Meknès, BP S40, 50000 Meknès, Morocco
b Dep. of Soil Management and Soil Care, Ghent Univ., Coupure 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium

* Corresponding author (marc.vanmeirvenne{at}rug.ac.be)

Soil heterogeneity complicates the design and analysis of field experiments. Block designs were developed for this purpose. However, the analysis of experimental results supposes that the residuals from the treatment are spatially independent and that within block variation is random. Experience indicates that this rarely is the case in field experiments, because of the strong spatial autocorrelation of soil properties. This paper applies geostatistical tools, such as variogram analysis and conditional stochastic simulation, to investigate the optimal experimental plot size and shape and to decide which experimental design is to be preferred. The methodology is illustrated using a case study of water-use efficiency under semiarid conditions in Morocco. It was found that under these conditions an experiment with 16 treatments would use best a plot size of 4 by 8 m oriented north-south, configured according to an incomplete block design with 8 plots per block oriented in two rows in the east-west direction.

Abbreviations: AWC, available-water capacity • ccdf, conditional cumulative distribution function • CV, coefficient of variation • Db, bulk density • Ei, average efficiency • FCw, field capacity • GM, gravimetric moisture • NSR, nugget/sill ratio • OC, organic C • PWPw, permanent-wilting point • SGSIM, Sequential Gaussian Simulation (SGSIM)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Soil Science Society of America.