HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Assouline, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Assouline, S. Agricola Articles by Assouline, S. Related Collections Water Use Irrigation

DIVISION S-6—SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

The Effects of Microdrip and Conventional Drip Irrigation on Water Distribution and Uptake

Dep. of Environmental Physics and Irrigation, Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, A.R.O.—Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel

* Corresponding author (vwshmuel{at}agri.gov.il)

Drip irrigation at a rate close to plant water uptake necessitates low application rates (microdrip), which affect soil water regime and plant response. This study compare the effect of three emitter discharges, 0.25, 2.0, and 8.0 L h^-1, on different aspects of the water regime in daily drip irrigated corn (Zea Mays L.), relying on field observations and numerical simulations. Field observations show that microdrip irrigation (i) tends to increase yield although this was not statistically significant under the experimental conditions; (ii) induces higher relative water content values in the 0- to 0.30-m depth layer, and lower ones in the 0.60- to 0.90-m layer. Numerical simulations, carried out using HYDRUS-2D, show that microdrip irrigation led to the smallest wetted volume with the least extreme water content gradients both in the horizontal and the vertical axes. A saturated zone below the emitter was obtained only for the 8.0 L h^-1 discharge. Comparing water content distributions with depth at the end of the application of the same amount of water close to the emitter, the driest profile is obtained for the lowest application rate. However, when compared at solar noon representing the time of the highest plant water demand, the upper 0.20-m layer of the soil irrigated at the lowest rate was the wettest. Microdrip irrigation has reduced the dynamic changes in the water content during the day in the most active part of the root zone. It also caused the smallest reduction in the simulated water uptake relative to the potential value.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. M. Dudley, A. Ben-Gal, and N. Lazarovitch Drainage Water Reuse: Biological, Physical, and Technological Considerations for System Management J. Environ. Qual., September 2, 2008; 37(5_Supplement): S-25 - S-35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Simunek, M. Th. van Genuchten, and M. Sejna Development and Applications of the HYDRUS and STANMOD Software Packages and Related Codes Vadose Zone J., May 27, 2008; 7(2): 587 - 600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Sansoulet, Y.-M. Cabidoche, P. Cattan, S. Ruy, and J. Simunek Spatially Distributed Water Fluxes in an Andisol under Banana Plants: Experiments and Three-Dimensional Modeling Vadose Zone J., May 27, 2008; 7(2): 819 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Assouline, M. Moller, S. Cohen, M. Ben-Hur, A. Grava, K. Narkis, and A. Silber Soil-Plant System Response to Pulsed Drip Irrigation and Salinity: Bell Pepper Case Study Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 3, 2006; 70(5): 1556 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]