SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Block, R.
Right arrow Articles by Pennock, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Block, R.
Right arrow Articles by Pennock, D. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Block, R.
Right arrow Articles by Pennock, D. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecosystem Management
Right arrow Structure and Properties
Right arrow Forest Soils
Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:1669-1676 (2002)
© 2002 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-7—FOREST & RANGE SOILS

Quantifying Harvesting Impacts using Soil Compaction and Disturbance Regimes at a Landscape Scale

R. Block, K. C. J. Van Rees* and D. J. Pennock

Dep. of Soil Science, 51 Campus Dr., Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, S7N 5A8

* Corresponding author (vanrees{at}sask.usask.ca)

Several indicators have been identified for the conservation and maintenance of soil criterion in the Montreal Protocol. The objective of this study was to use soil compaction and disturbance measures to determine harvesting impacts at a landscape scale in the boreal forest of Saskatchewan. Forest harvesting impacts were studied pre and postharvest for five harvested sites by (i) sampling soil bulk density (Db) at prescribed grid-points, and (ii) measuring soil disturbance regimes on two 30-m transects at each grid-point. Mean soil Db in the harvested area increased significantly (8–11%) from pre to postharvest conditions for the two winter-harvested sites at both the 10- and 20-cm depths, while two of the three summer harvested sites also showed significant Db increases (7–15%) at the 10-cm depth. Combining all five sites, showed that after harvest 32% of all the grid-points had an increased Db of >15%. Mean soil Db at a 10-cm depth for roadways and landings was significantly higher (8–14%) than postharvest Db for postharvest levels at four of the five harvested sites. Surface soil disturbance regimes were higher for the summer-harvested sites than that for the winter-harvested sites. Landscape position showed no significant differences in Db between the shoulder, backslope, and footslope positions; however, within each landscape position, significant differences in Db were found between pre and postharvest conditions. Soil Db and soil disturbance regimes measured on a grid basis provided a simple, but reliable method for monitoring soil compaction and disturbance effects from harvesting at a landscape scale.

Abbreviations: BE, Birch East • BM, Bull Moose • BW, Birch West • Db, bulk density • DEM, digital elevation model • RL, Roberts Lake • SL, Stuart Lake




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. Prevost
Predicting Soil Properties from Organic Matter Content following Mechanical Site Preparation of Forest Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2004; 68(3): 943 - 949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Soil Science Society of America.