SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burt, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burt, T. P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burt, T. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Models
Right arrow Pedology
Right arrow Spatial Distribution
Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:1897-1910 (2002)
© 2002 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-5—PEDOLOGY

Identification and Characterization of Pedogeomorphological Processes on a Hillslope

S. J. Park*,a and T. P. Burtb

a Center for Development Research (ZEF), Univ. of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Str. 3, 53113, Bonn, Germany
b Dep. of Geography, Univ. of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK

* Corresponding author (spark{at}uni-bonn.de)

This study aims to identify process-response relationships between pedogeomorphological processes and the spatial distribution of soil properties on a hillslope. Thirty-two physical and chemical attributes of 502 soil samples collected from 64 soil profiles on a hillslope in Somerset, UK, were analyzed using an ordination technique. Five factors explaining 80% of the total variation were first identified. Each factor was then regressed with terrain attributes to examine the influence of hillslope geomorphometry on soil distributions. Two-way ANOVA was used to separate the total variance of individual soil properties into vertical and lateral components, and the results were compared with the results of the ordination. The five factors were interpreted as demonstrating the effects of podzolization, nutrient dynamics, Mn leaching, erosion weathering, and soil acidification. The ability to predict soil properties over the landscape using terrain information varies widely among soil properties measured. In general, topsoil properties are better correlated with terrain attributes than subsoil properties. Contemporary pedological and geomorphological processes are most active in the surface horizon, which results in clear lateral differentiation of soil properties. For subsurface soils, only those few soil properties that showed a clear spatial pattern could be successfully modeled using terrain attributes. This research demonstrates that clear differences in the spatial distribution of individual soil properties are mainly determined by differential involvement in in situ pedogenesis and lateral slope processes. Future soil-landscape modeling attempts should pay more attention to the selection of soil properties and the interpretation of statistical results in relation to process-response dynamics.

Abbreviations: DEM, digital elevation models • ECEC, effective cation-exchange capacity • LOI, loss-on-ignition • PC1, Principal Component 1 • PC2, Principal Component 2 • PC3, Principal Component 3 • PC4, Principal Component 4 • PC5, Principal Component 5 • PCA, principal component analysis • SS, sum of the squares • TEB, total exchangeable bases • TOd, extractable total oxides




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. D. Tomer, C. A. Cambardella, D. E. James, and T. B. Moorman
Surface-Soil Properties and Water Contents across Two Watersheds with Contrasting Tillage Histories
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 27, 2006; 70(2): 620 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
F. M. Ziadat
Analyzing Digital Terrain Attributes to Predict Soil Attributes for a Relatively Large Area
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 25, 2005; 69(5): 1590 - 1599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. D. Tomer and D. E. James
Do Soil Surveys and Terrain Analyses Identify Similar Priority Sites for Conservation?
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 1905 - 1915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Soil Science Society of America.