HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lister, T. W. Articles by Patterson, S. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lister, T. W. Articles by Patterson, S. C. Agricola Articles by Lister, T. W. Articles by Patterson, S. C. Related Collections Soil Fertility and Productivity Forest Soils Plant and Soil Interactions

DIVISION S-7—FOREST & RANGE SOILS

Role of Vegetation in Mitigating Soil Quality Impacted by Forest Harvesting

^a Dep. of Forestry (0324), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
^b Forest Science Lab., Westvaco Corp., 180 Westvaco Road, Summerville, SC 29483

^* Corresponding author (jaburger{at}vt.edu).

The initial growth response of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) to competition control is well documented. However, the benefits of competing vegetation to soil quality have not been thoroughly investigated. A study was conducted: (i) to evaluate the effectiveness of bedding site preparation in recovering soil processes and productivity following disturbance; and (ii) to determine if different levels of vegetation control have differential effects on soil processes that aid in the recovery and maintenance of soil productivity. Study plots were established on a wet pine flat on South Carolina's Coastal Plain. Treatments included a range of three disturbance classes (undisturbed, compression tracked, and churned), two site preparation treatments (flat planted and bedded), and a gradient of vegetation control (no vegetation control, operational level weed control, and complete weed control). Compacted soils generally increased in bulk density (14%) and decreased in macroporosity (25%) and hydraulic conductivity (69%) compared with undisturbed treatments. Churning had no significant net effect on the soil physical properties measured; however, it did increase net N mineralization by over 100% on flat-planted treatment plots. Bedding fully ameliorated the effects of soil compaction based on the physical properties measured. Trends suggest some improvements in soil quality with increasing levels of non-crop vegetation biomass; however, during 2 yr of operational vegetation control, the beneficial effects of the non-crop vegetation were marginal.

Abbreviations: SMBC, soil microbial biomass carbon • TDR, time domain reflectometry

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. H. Eisenbies, J. A. Burger, W. M. Aust, S. C. Patterson, and T. R. Fox Assessing Change in Soil-Site Productivity of Intensively Managed Loblolly Pine Plantations Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., December 2, 2005; 70(1): 130 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Eisenbies, J. A. Burger, W. M. Aust, and S. C. Patterson Soil Physical Disturbance and Logging Residue Effects on Changes in Soil Productivity in Five-Year-Old Pine Plantations Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 29, 2005; 69(6): 1833 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]