HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bodhinayake, W. Articles by Xiao, C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bodhinayake, W. Articles by Xiao, C. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Bodhinayake, W. Articles by Xiao, C. Related Collections Structure and Properties Soil Hydrology Analytical Solutions

DIVISION S-1—SOIL PHYSICS

New Method for Determining Water-Conducting Macro- and Mesoporosity from Tension Infiltrometer

^a Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8 Canada
^b Dep. of Physics and Engineering Physics, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

^* Corresponding author (sibing{at}duke.usask.ca).

Characterization of water-conducting porosity at and near saturation is required in understanding rainfall and snowmelt infiltration and runoff as well as chemical transport in soil. There are methods available to quantify water-conducting porosity in situ, but with serious limitations. The objective of this paper was to present a general equation for water-conducting porosity based on ponded- and tension-infiltration measurements. Some analytical solutions are developed for specific unsaturated hydraulic conductivity functions such as the Gardner's exponential and rational power models, Brooks and Corey model, and van Genuchten–Mualem model. Tension infiltrometer measurements were taken at six different pressure heads between –0.3 to –2.2 kPa and double-ring infiltrometer measurements at a pressure head of 0.35 kPa. The analytical solutions were compared with numerical solutions and existing methods for calculation of water-conducting porosity. Both the analytical and numerical solutions can reliably determine the water-conducting porosity of surface soils in situ within the practical pressure head range of the tension infiltrometer. Our method gave consistent water-conducting porosity, regardless of the width of pressure head ranges. The existing methods overestimated water-conducting macroporosity by a factor of greater than two and overestimated total water-conducting porosity by a factor of >10 for measurements taken at large pressure head intervals compared with that of our method. Combining with hydraulic parameter estimation from tension infiltrometer measurements, our method may reduce the number of tension infiltration measurements required to calculate water-conducting porosity.

Abbreviations: DP, Dunn and Philips approach • WL, Watson and Luxmore approach

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Moret and J. L. Arrue Characterizing Soil Water-Conducting Macro and Mesoporosity as Influenced by Tillage Using Tension Infiltrometry Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 12, 2007; 71(2): 500 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Buczko, O. Bens, and R. F. Huttl Tillage Effects on Hydraulic Properties and Macroporosity in Silty and Sandy Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 27, 2006; 70(6): 1998 - 2007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Si and W. Bodhinayake Determining Soil Hydraulic Properties from Tension Infiltrometer Measurements: Fuzzy Regression Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 27, 2005; 69(6): 1922 - 1930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Bodhinayake, B. C. Si, and K. Noborio Determination of Hydraulic Properties in Sloping Landscapes from Tension and Double-Ring Infiltrometers Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2004; 3(3): 964 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]