|
|
||||||||
a University of Kentucky, Dep. of Agronomy, N-122 Ag. Science North, Lexington, KY 40502
b Dep. of Biosyst. and Agric. Eng., University of Kentucky, 218 C.E. Barnhart, Lexington, KY 40546-0276
* Corresponding author (mueller{at}uky.edu)
The selection of a spatial interpolation methods will impact the quality of site-specific soil fertility maps. The objective of this study was to describe and predict the relative performance of inverse distance weighted (IDW) and ordinary kriging. Soil samples were collected on 30.5-m grids for fields in five Kentucky counties and analyzed for pH, buffer pH, P, K, Ca, and Mg. From these data sets, 61-m grid subsets were extracted. Data were interpolated with IDW and kriging procedures. Prediction efficiency (PE) was determined using an independent dataset (PEvalidation) and with cross-validation (PEcross-validation). Multiple stepwise regression was used to develop models that described the relative performance of ordinary kriging and IDW with statistical properties of the data. At the 30.5-m grid scale, the performance of ordinary kriging relative to IDW improved as the range of spatial correlation increased and fit of the semivariogram model improved. However, at the 61.0-m grid scale, the performance of ordinary kriging relative to IDW diminished as the degree of spatial structure increased and the fit of the semivariogram model improved. Alone, PEcross-validation poorly describes the performance of PEvalidation across locations, soil properties, and sampling intervals (r2 = 0.18). However, in combination with the range of spatial correlation, substantial variability at the 30.5-m grid scale was described for variables with sample semivariograms that reached plateaus (R2 = 0.61). In some situations, better decisions will be made regarding the use of these methods by considering the range of spatial correlation and cross-validation statistics.
Abbreviations: FULL, datasets created by combining the validation and 30.5-m grid datasets IDW, inverse distance weighted IDW1.2, IDW interpolation with a distance exponent of 1.2 MSE, mean squared error PE, prediction efficiency PEvalidation, PE determined using an independent data set PEcross-validation, PE determined with cross-validation
PEvalidation, difference in PE between ordinary kriging and IDW1.2 as determined using an independent validation dataset
PEcross-validation, difference in PE between ordinary kriging and IDW1.2 as determined with cross-validation r2semivariogram, F, the coefficient of determination for the relationship between semivariogram pairs and the semivariogram model values RangeF, range of spatial correlation as determined with the FULL datasets RangeS, range of spatial correlation as determined with the sample dataset RSV relative structural variability RSVF, RSV as determined with the FULL datasets RSVS, RSV as determined with the sample datasets
RSV, RSVF RSVS SSFM, Site-specific fertility management
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T.-L. Liu, K.-W. Juang, and D.-Y. Lee Interpolating Soil Properties Using Kriging Combined with Categorical Information of Soil Maps Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 23, 2006; 70(4): 1200 - 1209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||