HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kelleners, T. J. Articles by Skaggs, T. H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kelleners, T. J. Articles by Skaggs, T. H. Agricola Articles by Kelleners, T. J. Articles by Skaggs, T. H. Related Collections Water Content Time Domain Reflectometry, TDR Other Geophysical Methods

Division S-1—Soil Physics

Frequency Dependence of the Complex Permittivity and Its Impact on Dielectric Sensor Calibration in Soils

^a Dep. of Plants, Soils, and Biometeorology, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322
^b USDA-ARS, George E. Brown, Jr. Salinity Lab., 450 W. Big Springs Road, Riverside, CA 92507
^c USDA-ARS, Water Management Research Lab., 9611 S. Riverbend Ave., Parlier, CA 93648

^* Corresponding author (tkelleners{at}cc.usu.edu).

The capacitance (CAP) method and time domain reflectometry (TDR) are two popular electromagnetic techniques used to estimate soil water content. However, the frequency dependence of the real and imaginary part of the permittivity complicates sensor calibration. The frequency dependence can be particularly significant in fine-textured soils containing clay minerals. In this work, we applied both the CAP method and TDR to a nondispersive medium (fine sand) and a strongly dispersive medium (bentonite). The measurements were conducted for a range of water contents. Results using a network analyzer showed that the frequency dependence of the real permittivity of the bentonite was particularly strong below 500 MHz. Above this frequency, the real permittivity of the bentonite was mainly a function of the water content. The TDR predicted apparent permittivity in the bentonite was below the CAP predicted real permittivity at low water contents. This was attributed to the dispersive nature of the bentonite combined with the high frequency of operation of TDR (up to 3 GHz in dry soil). The CAP sensor (frequency of 100–150 MHz) overestimated the real permittivity of the bentonite at high water contents. An electric circuit model proved partially successful in correcting the CAP data by taking the dielectric losses into account. The TDR signal became attenuated at higher water contents. It seems worthwhile to raise the effective frequency of dielectric sensors above 500 MHz to benefit from the relatively stable permittivity region at this frequency.

Abbreviations: CAP, capacitance • EC, electrical conductivity • SF, scaled frequency • TDR, time domain reflectometry

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Th. Mazahrih, N. Katbeh-Bader, S. R. Evett, J. E. Ayars, and T. J. Trout Field Calibration Accuracy and Utility of Four Down-Hole Water Content Sensors Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2008; 7(3): 992 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Robinson, C. S. Campbell, J. W. Hopmans, B. K. Hornbuckle, S. B. Jones, R. Knight, F. Ogden, J. Selker, and O. Wendroth Soil Moisture Measurement for Ecological and Hydrological Watershed-Scale Observatories: A Review Vadose Zone J., February 25, 2008; 7(1): 358 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. Bandaranayake, L. R. Parsons, M. S. Borhan, and J. D. Holeton Performance of a Capacitance-Type Soil Water Probe in a Well-Drained Sandy Soil Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 16, 2007; 71(3): 993 - 1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Regalado, A. Ritter, and R. M. Rodriguez-Gonzalez Performance of the Commercial WET Capacitance Sensor as Compared with Time Domain Reflectometry in Volcanic Soils Vadose Zone J., April 9, 2007; 6(2): 244 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Evett, J. A. Tolk, and T. A. Howell Soil Profile Water Content Determination: Sensor Accuracy, Axial Response, Calibration, Temperature Dependence, and Precision Vadose Zone J., July 26, 2006; 5(3): 894 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Evett and G. W. Parkin Advances in Soil Water Content Sensing: The Continuing Maturation of Technology and Theory Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 986 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Jones, J. M. Blonquist Jr., D. A. Robinson, V. P. Rasmussen, and D. Or Standardizing Characterization of Electromagnetic Water Content Sensors: Part 1. Methodology Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 1048 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Logsdon Soil Dielectric Spectra from Vector Network Analyzer Data Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 2, 2005; 69(4): 983 - 989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]