| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
a Agricultural Analytical Services Lab., The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802
b USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, Curtin Road, University Park, PA 16802
c Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802
* Corresponding author (amw2{at}psu.edu)
The loss of P in runoff from agricultural land to which manure has been applied is related to water extractable P (WEP) in manure. However, a standard method to routinely measure WEP in manures has not been established and variables impacting the measurement have not been widely studied. In this investigation, the impact of manure holding times (1–22 d), WEP extract holding times (0–17 d with and without acidification), and method of P measurement on WEP were evaluated. In addition, four manure samples (one dairy, one swine, two poultry) and proposed WEP method were distributed to seven public and private laboratories to assess inter- and intralaboratory variability of WEP test results. The proposed method entailed extracting manures with water at a 1:200 ratio (manure solids/water), shaking for 60 min on a reciprocating shaker, and either filtering or centrifuging before P measurement by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP). Results show refrigerated (4°C) manure samples can be held up to 22 d and acidified extracts 18 d before analysis. Separation procedures (filtering vs. centrifuging) did not impact WEP measurements. While the method of P measurement (ICP vs. colorimetric) did have a significant impact on test results, the two methods were highly correlated and results within 5 to 10%. The proposed manure WEP method shows a high level of precision (relative standard deviations [RSDs] < 6.5) within laboratories, although greater variability (RSDs of 13.3–28.8) exists among laboratories when compared with other standard manure analyses, such as total P.
Abbreviations: ICP, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy • PSC, phosphorus source coefficient • RSD, relative standard deviation • WEP, water-extractable phosphorus
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. C. Makris, S. Quazi, P. Punamiya, D. Sarkar, and R. Datta Fate of Arsenic in Swine Waste from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2008; 37(4): 1626 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Ajiboye, O. O. Akinremi, Y. Hu, and D. N. Flaten Phosphorus Speciation of Sequential Extracts of Organic Amendments Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and X-ray Absorption Near-Edge Structure Spectroscopies J. Environ. Qual., October 16, 2007; 36(6): 1563 - 1576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. W. McDowell, D. M. Nash, and F. Robertson Sources of Phosphorus Lost from a Grazed Pasture Receiving Simulated Rainfall J. Environ. Qual., July 17, 2007; 36(5): 1281 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. L. Shober and J. T. Sims Integrating Phosphorus Source and Soil Properties into Risk Assessments for Phosphorus Loss Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 12, 2007; 71(2): 551 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. A. Kleinman, A. M. Wolf, A. N. Sharpley, D. B. Beegle, and L. S. Saporito Survey of Water-Extractable Phosphorus in Livestock Manures Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., April 11, 2005; 69(3): 701 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||
