SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 4 August 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1372-1378 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0366
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, S. P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, S. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Physics

Soil Physics

A Physically Derived Water Content/Permittivity Calibration Model for Coarse-Textured, Layered Soils

D. A. Robinsona,*, S. B. Jonesa, J. M. Blonquist, Jr.a and S. P. Friedmanb

a Dep. of Plants, Soils and Biometeorology, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322-4820
b The Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, (ARO) The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel

* Corresponding author (darearthscience{at}yahoo.com)

Many empirical formulas relating TDR-measured permittivity (Ka) to volumetric water content ({theta}) have been presented owing to the lack of a robust and accurate physically derived model describing this relationship across a range of soils. Soil-specific calibrations are often infeasible due to the time-consuming gravimetric sampling required for adequate calibration. In this work we propose a sample scale model for the Ka{theta} relationship in coarse-grained media using physically based pore-scale, or calibrated two-point, anchoring. Materials tested include mono-size glass spheres and quartz sand grains in addition to two sandy soils. The performance of the model was comparable with the empirical models of Topp et al. (1980) for the different media. The model accounts for particle shape and bulk density using a two-phase pore-scale mixing model and refers to a wetting or draining profile with a sharp wetting or drying front. Our measurements indicate the absence of dielectric hysteresis for the narrow size distribution materials studied. An alternate calibration approach only requires the measured soil effective permittivities for dry ({epsilon}dry) and saturated ({epsilon}sat) conditions (i.e., two-phase mixtures) and knowledge of the bulk density. We recommend a general value of 2.8 for {epsilon}dry in soils with predominantly quartz mineralogy; the model then requiring only the {epsilon}sat to develop a soil specific calibration. The results provide insight into the appropriate ‘refractive index’ modeling of layered (wetting/drying) soil profiles with the grain-scale modeled two-phase permittivity providing bounds for the sample-scale three-phase porous medium.

Abbreviations: TDR, time domain reflectometry







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.