HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kaspar, T. C. Articles by Jung, Y. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kaspar, T. C. Articles by Jung, Y. S. Agricola Articles by Kaspar, T. C. Articles by Jung, Y. S. Related Collections Cover Crops

Soil & Water Management & Conservation

Examining Changes in Soil Organic Carbon with Oat and Rye Cover Crops Using Terrain Covariates

^a USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Lab., Ames, IA 50011
^b Div. of Biological Environment, Kangwon National Univ., Chunchun, Korea Joint contribution from USDA-ARS and Kangwon National Univ

^* Corresponding author (kaspar{at}nstl.gov)

Winter cover crops have the potential to increase soil organic C in the corn (Zea mays L.)–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation in the upper Midwest. Management effects on soil C, however, are often difficult to measure because of the spatial variation of soil C across the landscape. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of oat (Avena sativa L.), rye (Secale cereale L.), and a mixture of oat and rye used as winter cover crops following soybean on soil C levels over 3 yr and both phases of a corn–soybean rotation using terrain attributes as covariates to account for the spatial variability in soil C. A field experiment was initiated in 1996 with cover crop treatments, both phases of a corn–soybean rotation, and a controlled-traffic no-till system. Oat, rye, and oat–rye mixture cover crop treatments were overseeded into the soybean phase of the rotation in late August each year. Cover crop treatments were not planted into or after the corn phase of the rotation. Soil C concentration was measured on 450 samples taken across both rotation phases in a 7.62-m grid pattern in the late spring of 2000, 2001, and 2002. Slope, relative elevation, and wetness index (WI) were used as covariates in the analysis of variance to remove 77% of the variation of soil C caused by landscape driven patterns of soil C. Soil C concentrations were 0.0023 g C g soil^–1 higher in 2001 and 0.0016 g C g soil^–1 higher in 2002 than in 2000. The main effects of cover crops were not significant, but the interaction of cover crops and rotation phase was significant. The rye cover crop treatment had 0.0010 g C g soil^–1 higher soil C concentration than the no-cover-crop control in the soybean phase of the rotation, which included cover crops, but had 0.0016 g C g soil^–1 lower C concentrations than the control in the corn phase of the rotation, which did not have cover crops. Using terrain covariates allowed us to remove most of the spatial variability of soil C, but oat and rye cover crops planted every other year after soybean did not increase soil C concentrations averaged over years and rotation phases.

Abbreviations: A_s, specific upslope contributing area • CC, organic carbon concentration • DEM, digital elevation model • GIS, geographic information system • GPS, global positioning system • LSF, length-slope factor • SPI, stream power index • UTM, Universal Transverse Mercator • WI, wetness index • WLOI, weight-loss-on-ignition