SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 22 August 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1731-1740 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0414
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikutta, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mikutta, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mikutta, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

Soil Chemistry

Phosphate Desorption from Goethite in the Presence of Galacturonate, Polygalacturonate, and Maize Mucigel (Zea mays L.)

Christian Mikuttaa,*, Günter Neumannb and Friederike Langa

a Institute of Ecology, Berlin Univ. of Technology, Salzufer 12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
b Institute for Plant Nutrition, Univ. of Hohenheim, Fuwirthstr. 20, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany

* Corresponding author (christian.mikutta{at}tu-berlin.de)

Uronates are important constituents of maize mucilage and polyuronates are used as a simplified model of the soil–root interface. We tested whether galacturonate (GA) and polygalacturonate (PGA) impair the diffusion of phosphate (PO4) into and out of pores of a synthetic goethite (147 m2 g–1) and whether the effect of maize mucigel (MU) is comparable to PGA. We measured the PO4 desorption kinetics of goethites in batch experiments over 2 wk at pH 5. One part of the goethite was equilibrated with organic substances before PO4 addition, another part after addition of PO4. Before the desorption experiments, the porosity of our samples was analyzed by N2 gas adsorption. In each treatment a rapid initial desorption was followed by a slow desorption reaction, which is assigned to the diffusion of PO4 out of mineral pores. No consistent relation between the micro- and mesoporosity and the rate of the slow PO4 desorption was observed. Compared with the C-free control, only PGA and MU affected the fraction of PO4 mobilized by the fast and slow desorption reaction: when PGA was sorbed to goethite before PO4, twice as much PO4 was mobilized via the fast reaction than in the treatment where PO4 was sorbed before PGA, suggesting a decreased accessibility of goethite pores to PO4. Mucigel, however, showed reversed effects, which is ascribed to its differing chemical composition. In conclusion, PGA seems inappropriate as a model substance for maize MU collected from non-axenic sand cultures. Under the experimental conditions chosen, the efficacy of all organic substances to increase PO4 solution concentrations by pore clogging and sorption competition is small.

Abbreviations: DOM, dissolved organic matter • GA, galacturonate • MU, mucigel • OM, organic matter • PE, polyethylene • PO4, phosphate • PGA, polygalacturonate







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.