HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Buczko, U. Articles by Hüttl, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Buczko, U. Articles by Hüttl, R. F. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Buczko, U. Articles by Hüttl, R. F. Related Collections Tillage Infiltration Hydraulic Conductivity

Soil Physics

Tillage Effects on Hydraulic Properties and Macroporosity in Silty and Sandy Soils

^a Univ. of Rostock, Institute for Land Use, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 6, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
^b Brandenburg Univ. of Technology, Cottbus, Chair of Soil Protection and Recultivation, P.O. Box 101344, D-03013 Cottbus, Germany

^* Corresponding author (uwe.buczko{at}uni-rostock.de)

In agricultural soils, macroporosity and hydraulic properties are influenced by tillage practices. The objective of this study was to characterize macroporosity and surface soil hydraulic properties in two soils of different texture (Lietzen: sandy loam–Humic Dystrudept; Adenstedt: silt loam; Typic Hapludoll) under conventional (CT) and conservational (RT) tillage systems. Soil hydraulic conductivity was assessed in situ by ponded infiltration with single rings (n = 70) and tension infiltration by means of a "closed-top" hood infiltrometer (HIF; n = 48). Macroporosity (pore diameters >1 mm) was estimated from differences in infiltration at saturation and at –3 cm H₂O soil matric potential. Mean saturated hydraulic conductivity (K_s) for Lietzen was 3.1 x 10^–5 m s^–1 and for Adenstedt was 4.3 x 10^–5 m s^–1. These values are by one order of magnitude higher than values estimated from soil texture. This implies that soil structure has a dominant influence on hydraulic conductivity. Mean values of macroporosity were 0.005% for Lietzen and 0.018% for Adenstedt (using the method of Watson and Luxmoore). The respective values were 0.0008 and 0.0013% when the method of Bodhinayake et al. was used. For Adenstedt, RT showed higher macroporosity than CT (not significant at P < 0.05 for n = 12). Such treatment-induced differences were less developed for Lietzen. The K_s values measured with the ponded ring infiltrometer (RIF) at the sandy Lietzen site were higher than the corresponding values measured with the tension infiltrometer. These differences may be caused by subcritical soil water repellency (i.e., contact angles of the soil-water-air interface below 90°), although further factors could also be important (e.g., air entrapment, differences in water saturation, geometry of infiltration devices).

Abbreviations: CT, conventional tillage • HIF, hood infiltrometer • RIF, ring infiltrometer • RT, reduced (conservation) tillage • TIF, tension infiltrometer • WRC, water retention characteristics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Blanco-Canqui and R. Lal Impacts of Long-Term Wheat Straw Management on Soil Hydraulic Properties under No-Tillage Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 8, 2007; 71(4): 1166 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]