|
|
||||||||
Dep. of Agribusiness, Sci. and Tech., Brigham Young Univ.-Idaho, Rexburg, ID 83460-1110
Dep. of Soil Science, Vernon James Research and Extension Center, 207 Research Rd., Plymouth, NC 27692
Dep. of Soil Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7619
Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Dep. of Soil Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7619
* Corresponding author (williams{at}byui.edu).
Environmental concerns about increasing NO3 levels in watersheds in North Carolina and elsewhere indicate the need for better N fertilizer management. Nitrate levels might be reduced if N rates could be adjusted based on field- or site-specific knowledge of corn (Zea mays L.) response to N fertilization. Currently, there is no effective soil N test for the humid southeastern USA. This study was conducted to compare three soil N tests for practicality, precision, and ability to correlate with economic optimum N rate (EONR) and fertilizer response on southeastern U.S. soils. The soil N tests were the Illinois soil N test (ISNT), the gas pressure test (GPT), and the incubation and residual N test (IRNT). Soil samples were collected from the sites of 16 N-response trials from 2001 to 2003 where different mineralizable and residual N levels were expected. The ISNT was determined to be the most practical test because it was the easiest to perform and could be completed in 1 d. The ISNT and GPT had better precision (lower CV) than the IRNT (9 and 13 vs. 61%, respectively). All three tests were related to EONR; ISNT had the strongest linear relationship (r2 = 0.90) when consideration was restricted to sites on mineral soils. The ISNT and GPT were related to delta yield (maximum yield minus check yield; r2 = 0.49 and 0.60, respectively) and fertilizer response (r2 = 0.31 and 0.51, respectively). These results indicate the potential of the ISNT and GPT to account for mineralizable and residual soil N levels and thus improve current corn N recommendations in the humid southeastern USA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Sharifi, B. J. Zebarth, D. L. Burton, C. A. Grant, and G. A. Porter Organic Amendment History and Crop Rotation Effects on Soil Nitrogen Mineralization Potential and Soil Nitrogen Supply in a Potato Cropping System Agron. J., October 21, 2008; 100(6): 1562 - 1572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sainz Rozas, P. A. Calvino, H. E. Echeverria, P. A. Barbieri, and M. Redolatti Contribution of Anaerobically Mineralized Nitrogen to the Reliability of Planting or Presidedress Soil Nitrogen Test in Maize Agron. J., June 16, 2008; 100(4): 1020 - 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. M. Laboski, J. E. Sawyer, D. T. Walters, L. G. Bundy, R. G. Hoeft, G. W. Randall, and T. W. Andraski Evaluation of the Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test in the North Central Region of the United States Agron. J., June 16, 2008; 100(4): 1070 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Spargo and M. M. Alley Modification of the Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test to Improve Measurement Precision and Increase Sample Throughput Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2008; 72(3): 823 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Khan, R. L. Mulvaney, T. R. Ellsworth, and C. W. Boast The Myth of Nitrogen Fertilization for Soil Carbon Sequestration J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1821 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Williams, C. R. Crozier, J. G. White, R. W. Heiniger, R. P. Sripada, and D. A. Crouse Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test Predicts Southeastern U.S. Corn Economic Optimum Nitrogen Rates Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., April 5, 2007; 71(3): 735 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||