SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 12 March 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:280-288 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0142
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurrass, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schaumann, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hurrass, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schaumann, G. E.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hurrass, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schaumann, G. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Kinetics
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Soil Hydrology
Right arrow Water repellency

SOIL PHYSICS

Hydration Kinetics of Wettable and Water-Repellent Soils

Julia Hurrass and Gabriele E. Schaumann*

Inst. of Science Organic and Environmental Chemistry, Universtiy Koblenz-Landau Universitaetsstr.1, D-56072 Koblenz, Germany

* Corresponding author (schaumann{at}uni-koblenz.de).

The hydration kinetics of soil organic matter (SOM) are influential factors for transport and sorption processes in soil. Nevertheless, our knowledge about wetting and swelling processes, which both control the overall hydration kinetics, is limited. In this study, we observed the hydration process of actually water-repellent and wettable soil samples by three independent methods. The rate of water uptake by water-repellent samples was distinctly lower than that of wettable samples when the water was supplied in the liquid phase, but was comparable when water was supplied in the gas phase. Gravimetric measurements of the water uptake and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry showed that wetting of water-repellent soils may last up to 3 wk. This duration is distinctly longer than the water drop penetration time of the samples, which consequently only reflects the first wetting step of the soil surface and does not consider infiltration of larger amounts of water. Since the achievement of equilibrium conditions is a slow process, the hydration kinetics of SOM may control transport and sorption kinetics in water-repellent soils. Differences in the freezing, melting, and evaporation processes of soil water of actually water-repellent and wettable soil samples, observed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), are probably only a consequence of different water contents under field conditions. Consequently, the DSC measurements provided no evidence of a general difference in the way water binds in water-repellent and wettable soil samples.

Abbreviations: DSC, differential scanning calorimetry • NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance • SOM, soil organic matter • TG, thermogravimetry • WDPT, water drop penetration time







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.