SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 9 August 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:1455-1459 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0044
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horn, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkham, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Horn, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkham, M. B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Horn, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkham, M. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Structure and Properties
Right arrow Soil Compaction
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation

SOIL PHYSICS

Mechanical Stresses in Soils Assessed from Bulk-Density and Penetration-Resistance Data Sets

R. Horna,*, K. H. Hartgeb, J. Bachmannc and M. B. Kirkhamd

a Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Kiel Univ. Olshausenstr. 40, Kiel, 24118 Germany
b Habichtshorst 9, Garbsen 30823, Germany
c Univ. of Hannover, Herrenhaeuserstr. 2, Hannover, 30419 Germany
d Dep. of Agronomy, 2004 Throckmorton Hall, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506-5501

* Corresponding author (rhorn{at}soils.uni-kiel.de).

Measurement of soil strength with sophisticated parameters is tedious and expensive. Therefore, we developed two straightforward methods to determine this parameter down to about 80 cm, based on the classical measurements of bulk density and penetration resistance as a function of depth. They were applied to three profiles of arable Luvisols, all developed from glacial till. For each method, a procedure was worked out that allows expression of the results in terms of a normal (NC) or precompacted (PC) state. We defined the NC state as that observed in packing characteristics of virgin soils like forests and meadows, and the PC state as the packing characteristics that exist in the topsoil of agricultural soils and intensely grazed areas. Bulk density data were used to examine the packing characteristics and overburden pressures with the assumption that the horizon was in a NC state below 80 cm. For penetration resistance, we assumed a linear increase in penetration resistance with depth to represent the hydrostatic stress distribution in the NC state and deviations of measured values from this line as the PC state. The upper approximately 60 cm of all three soils were compacted, which is proofed both for the penetration resistance and for the bulk density data. For both approaches, the dimensionless coefficient of "stresses at rest," K0, was calculated following the line of thought used in engineering soil mechanics (K0 = {sigma}x/{sigma}z, where {sigma}x and {sigma}z are the horizontal and vertical stresses, respectively). The K0 values are highest in the precompacted soil horizons and decrease with depth.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.