HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Prunty, L. Articles by Bell, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Prunty, L. Articles by Bell, J. Agricola Articles by Prunty, L. Articles by Bell, J. Related Collections Variably Saturated Fluid Flow Soil Hydrology Saturation

SOIL PHYSICS NOTE

Infiltration Rate vs. Gas Composition and Pressure in Soil Columns

Department of Soil Science, North Dakota State Univ., P.O. Box 5638, Fargo, ND 58105

^* Corresponding author (lyle.prunty{at}ndsu.edu).

Infiltration is influenced by soil gases. Studies have found that CO₂ has a large impact on infiltration. Since CO₂ is highly soluble, soil flooded with it before infiltration has greater saturation and a greater infiltration rate. Our objective was to compare infiltration rates when soil pore gas consisted of (i) CO₂ at atmospheric pressure, (ii) air at atmospheric pressure, and (iii) air at various vacuum levels. A vacuum should, similar to CO₂, reduce encapsulated gas and increase the infiltration rate. Results were that infiltration under 1- to 2-mm constant-head conditions tended to be more rapid at low air pressures. Falling-head infiltration, from 67.8- to 13.8-cm water head, was fastest with CO₂, intermediate with a vacuum that removed all dry air gases, and slowest with air at atmospheric pressure. The final falling-head infiltration rates with CO₂ and vacuum were 1.9 and 1.6 times faster, respectively, than with atmospheric air.

Abbreviations: A, atmospheric air treatment • C, carbon dioxide treatment • V, vacuum treatment