SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 August 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:1585-1592 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0130
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Yeh, H.-D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Yeh, H.-D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Yeh, H.-D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Statistics
Right arrow Data acquisition and assimilation
Right arrow Soil Pollution

SOIL PHYSICS

Optimum Allocation for Soil Contamination Investigations in Hsinchu, Taiwan, by Double Sampling

Ya-Chi Chang and Hund-Der Yeh*

National Chiao Tung Univ., 75 Po-Ai St., Hsinchu, 300 Taiwan

* Corresponding author (hdyeh{at}mail.nctu.edu.tw).

The double sampling (DS) scheme is a cost-effective sampling method that combines an expensive measurement procedure with an inexpensive but less accurate one. Double sampling works when the true correlation of determination ({rho}2) between two techniques is known in advance, but that is hardly ever the case. By assuming a {rho}2 < 0.9, a three-stage procedure (TSP) in DS selects a preliminary pool of samples and estimates {rho}2, from which the optimal allocation of samples is determined. There may be excessive and unnecessary sampling during a TSP when {rho}2 > 0.9. The main objective of this study was to extend the TSP and determine the optimum allocation of the samples under a fixed budget condition for the case {rho}2 > 0.9. A soil from Hsinchu, Taiwan, contaminated with heavy metals Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni, Cr, and Cd was sampled at 0.15, 0.3, 0.45, and 0.6 m deep at 36 sites (144 samples). All samples were analyzed with field-portable x-ray fluorescence and a subset of 40 samples was selected for analyses of Zn, Cu, and Pb with standard methods in the laboratory. Results from both measurements were linearly correlated with estimated {rho}2 values of 0.96, 0.95, and 0.97 for Zn, Cu, and Pb, respectively. Considering a {rho}2 = 0.99, the optimum subsample and sample sizes were 5 out of 167, 4 out of 173, and 5 out of 167 for Zn, Cu, and Pb, respectively. The extended TSP analyses reduced the number of superfluous samples to only two or three, which was less than obtained by TSP (9–16).

Abbreviations: DS, double sampling • FPXRF, field-portable x-ray fluorescence • HEPB, Hsinchu Environmental Protection Bureau • LAB, standard method in laboratory • NTD, Taiwan dollars • SDR, Studentized deleted residual • TSP, three-stage procedure







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.