SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 28 September 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:1758-1769 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0034
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romero, P.
Right arrow Articles by Fereres, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Romero, P.
Right arrow Articles by Fereres, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Romero, P.
Right arrow Articles by Fereres, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Runoff
Right arrow Soil Hydrology

SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Curve Number Values for Olive Orchards under Different Soil Management

P. Romeroa, G. Castroa, J.A. Gómeza,* and E. Fereresb

a Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, CSIC, Apartado 4084, 14080 Córdoba, Spain
b Universidad de Córdoba, Dpto. de Agronomía, Avda. Menéndez Pidal S/N, 14071 Córdoba, Spain

* Corresponding author (ag2gocaj{at}uco.es).

The Soil Conservation Service curve number methodology (SCS-CN) has been used in hydrological and crop models to evaluate the effects of soil management in olive (Olea europaea L. subsp. europaea) orchards on runoff, erosion, and water balance. To our knowledge, it has never been calibrated or validated for olive orchards. A physically based runoff model for olive orchards at a hillslope scale was used to generate rainfall–runoff relationships for different scenarios of soil type (four), tree size (two), tree spacing (two), antecedent soil moisture (three), and soil management (11) for a 140-m-long and 5% steep hillslope. The resulting relationships were used to derive the values of the curve number parameter, CNd, for the SCS-CN methodology. The resulting CNd values were validated using rainfall–runoff data for three different locations and different soil management. Predictions of daily runoff using CNd were compared with those made using CN values extracted from the standard SCS-CN tables, CNSCS. The derived CNd values presented a root mean square error in runoff predictions between 0.5 and 7.3 mm, and a model efficiency between 82 and 97%. The extracted CNSCS values presented a root mean square error in runoff predictions between 1.4 and 10.4 mm, and a model efficiency between –81 and 89%. Our analysis identified some issues in the hydrology of olive orchards where our understanding remains limited. Among them are the need for further validation of the derived CN values given the limited rainfall–runoff data, and the effect of soil management on soil properties and their temporal evolution.

Abbreviations: CN, curve number • CNbf, curve number values developed through fitting to the observed runoff data • CNd, curve number values derived for olive orchards from the physically based model • CNSCS, curve number values extracted for olive orchards from the Soil Conservation Service curve number tables • CNI, curve number for dry antecedent soil moisture content • CNII, curve number for average antecedent soil moisture content • CNIII, curve number for wet antecedent soil moisture content • CC, cover crop soil management • CT, conventional tillage soil management • NT, no-till • RR, random roughness • SCS-CN, Soil Conservation Service curve number methodology







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.