HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Price, J. S. Articles by Faux, E. PubMed Articles by Price, J. S. Articles by Faux, E. Agricola Articles by Price, J. S. Articles by Faux, E. Related Collections Wetlands and Aquatic Processes

SOIL PHYSICS NOTE

A Method to Determine Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Living and Undecomposed Sphagnum Moss

^a Dep. of Geography, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1
^b Land Resource Science Dep., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
^c Currently at: Dep. of Geography, Univ. of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada T2N 1N4

^* Corresponding author (jsprice{at}fes.uwaterloo.ca).

Sphagnum mosses (Sphagnum L.) are the primary peat-forming plant in northern peatlands and rely on capillary transport of water to facilitate physiological processes. The unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of the living, undecomposed, and poorly decomposed mosses is needed to estimate and model water flux to their growing upper layer. This study describes a new apparatus to measure this in the highly porous (90%) hummock profile where the pore sizes are large and the mosses delicate, in which established methods do not work. Independent tension disks controlled the pressure head (, between 0 and –35 cm of water) and the pressure gradient and thus flow. The uppermost 5-cm layer of moss had a saturated hydraulic conductivity of 1800 µm s^–1, and decreased when unsaturated ( = –25 cm of water) to 0.03 µm s^–1. Moss 25 cm below the surface had equivalent values of 230 and 11.0 µm s^–1 at moisture contents of 0.18 to 0.22 m³ m^–3. The The soil water retention model RETC provided a good fit for both hydraulic conductivity and water retention when fitted simultaneously, but did not perform well to predict hydraulic conductivity from water retention data alone.