SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Si, B.C.
Right arrow Articles by Kachanoski, R.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Si, B.C.
Right arrow Articles by Kachanoski, R.G.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Si, B.C.
Right arrow Articles by Kachanoski, R.G.

Unified Solution for Infiltration and Drainage with Hysteresis

Theory and Field Test

B.C. Sia and R.G. Kachanoskia

a Soil Science Dep., Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5A8



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 A comparison of measured soil water storage, predicted soil water storage, and the predicted confidence (95%) interval during drainage using a unified solution with no hysteresis and the value of {alpha} from infiltration

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 A comparison of measured soil water storage and predicted soil water storage during drainage using the Haines' Jump hysteresis model and the value of {alpha}d from inverse procedures

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Comparison of the predicted drying scanning curves from the Parlange (1976) model (dashed line) and corresponding equivalent Haines' Jump hysteresis model (dotted line) for initial water content = 0.38, 0.31, and 0.27. The Broadbridge and White (1988) Eq. [5] as the wetting curve is also shown (solid line)

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 A comparison of measured soil water storage, predicted soil water storage, and the predicted confidence interval (95%) during drainage using the Haines' Jump hysteresis model and an a priori value of {alpha} estimated from Eq. [16] and the Parlange (1976) model

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Soil Science Society of America.