SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamphorst, E.C.
Right arrow Articles by Paz, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kamphorst, E.C.
Right arrow Articles by Paz, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kamphorst, E.C.
Right arrow Articles by Paz, A.

Predicting Depressional Storage from Soil Surface Roughness

E.C. Kamphorsta, V. Jettenb, J. Guérifa, J. Pitkänenc, B.V. Iversend, J.T. Douglase and A. Pazf

a Unité d'Agronomie Laon/Péronne, INRA, Laon, France
b Dep. of Physical Geography, Univ. of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
c MTT, Jokioinen, Finland
d Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Foulum, Denmark
e Scottish Agricultural College, Penicuik, UK
f Faculty of Sciences, Univ. of Coruña, Coruña, Spain



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Boundary conditions to fill digital evaluation model of a plot. Eight copies of the plot surface were arranged symmetrically around the inside plot to obtain a continuous surface ninefold larger than the plot

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Maximum depressional storage (MDS) values as a function of tillage (s = standard deviation; SE = standard error)

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Influence of grid spacing on maximum depressional storage (MDS), mean and standard deviation

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Random roughness (RR), limiting elevation difference (LD), and mean upslope depression (MUD) vs. maximum depressional storage (MDS). d = sample spacing. *** Significant at P = 0.001

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5 Planchon et al. (1998) tortuosity index (TP), Auerswald tortuosity index (TA), and limiting slope (LS) vs. maximum depressional storage (MDS)

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6 Influence of sample spacing and tillage on tortuosity (T)

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7 Evaluation of existing maximum depressional storage (MDS) predicting models. d = sample spacing, RMSE = root mean square error

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8 Models to predict a single value of maximum depressional storage (MDS) from random roughness (RR), with 95% confidence intervals. (a) all data (n = 221); (b) zoom of (a); (c) lab data (n = 48); (d) field data (n = 173). EV = explained variance

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Soil Science Society of America.